Re: Python Policy Updates

2011-03-25 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Jakub (2011.03.24_18:48:04_+0200) > But you can claim that only if the package depends on the python2.X > versions of all other modules it requires, even if some of them are > arch:all! (The policy doesn't explain this...) It does say: | Packaged modules available for one particular version of

Re: Python Policy Updates

2011-03-25 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Stefano Rivera , 2011-03-24, 15:35: I see we still suggest ${python:Provides}. I was encouraged in #debian-python to never use these unless there's an existing dependency on a versioned package name. Correctly using python Provides is expensive. Here's why: “Provides: python2.X-eggs” is sup

Re: Python Policy Updates

2011-03-24 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Scott (2011.03.24_15:45:36_+0200) > I think once we get to pyhton2.7 as the only supported python, it > won't matter. As long as we handle rebuilds after every transition, it already shouldn't matter (in Python 2 and 3). With dh_python2 we have the same rebuild requirements, but don't suggest $

Re: Python Policy Updates

2011-03-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, March 24, 2011 09:35:21 am Stefano Rivera wrote: > I see we still suggest ${python:Provides}. I was encouraged in > #debian-python to never use these unless there's an existing > dependency on a versioned package name. > > There are no real packages using a name like python2.X-modulen

Re: Python Policy Updates

2011-03-24 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Scott (2011.03.19_05:52:49_+0200) > > What else needs doing? I suggest making it clearer in the policy that byte-compilation etc. are best taken care of by helpers. The policy *is* probably the first place that someone looking to create a Python module/app package will look. There are a few pl

Re: Python Policy Updates

2011-03-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Friday, March 18, 2011 10:23:05 pm Scott Kitterman wrote: > Today's mail on XB-Python-Version motivates me to send out an overdue call > for inputs on further changes to the Python policy. I know that needs to > go. > > What else needs doing? > > Personally I'd like to concentrate on getting

Python Policy Updates

2011-03-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
Today's mail on XB-Python-Version motivates me to send out an overdue call for inputs on further changes to the Python policy. I know that needs to go. What else needs doing? Personally I'd like to concentrate on getting policy for Python 3 to the point that it's possible to produce a correct