Re: Bug#627787: ITP or RFP

2011-06-03 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Nicolas CANIART, 2011-06-03] > Is the "python-django-" mandatory for a django application package ? > I have a few problems with the package. I still have this last if you "import django.foo" then binary package name should be "python-django.foo", if you "import foo" then binary package name

Re: Bug#627787: ITP or RFP

2011-06-03 Thread Nicolas CANIART
Hi guys, I have a few more questions for you: Is the "python-django-" mandatory for a django application package ? I have a few problems with the package. I still have this last lintian warning: W: python-django-gerbi source: format-3.0-but-debian-changes-patch. It happens because some filena

Re: Bug#627787: ITP or RFP

2011-05-25 Thread Nicolas CANIART
I'm still reading the Debian Python policy, but thanks for the advice. The upstream author has plans to rename the package. Maybe I can wait he completed the transition / help him with the transition so it happens sooner. 2011/5/25 Jakub Wilk : > * Piotr Ożarowski , 2011-05-25, 10:15: >> >> sourc

Re: ITP or RFP

2011-05-25 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Piotr Ożarowski , 2011-05-25, 10:15: source package name doesn't matter that much, but please use "python-pages" rather than "python-django-page-cms" as binary package's name (as Debian Python Policy suggests) And "pages" is very bad name for a public Python module, especially if it's Djang

Re: ITP or RFP

2011-05-25 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Nicolas CANIART, 2011-05-24] > Thanks for the faster than light answers. With respect to Sandro > answer, I don't see why I couldn't join the Python Module Team, but my > participation may remain marginal. I estimate I can almost guarantee a > two year commitment to that package, beyond I cannot

Re: ITP or RFP

2011-05-24 Thread Nicolas CANIART
Hi ! Thanks for the faster than light answers. With respect to Sandro answer, I don't see why I couldn't join the Python Module Team, but my participation may remain marginal. I estimate I can almost guarantee a two year commitment to that package, beyond I cannot tell. There are also a few depe

ITP ! (Was: Re: ITP or RFP)

2011-05-23 Thread Philipp Hagemeister
Anybody can file an ITP (and in fact, I'd guesstimate more than half of the ITPs are filed by people without @debian.org addresses). An RFP should only be filed if you're unable/unwilling to package it yourself. > 5 RFP This is a Request For Package. You have found an interesting > piece of softw

Re: ITP or RFP

2011-05-23 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 05:43:43PM +0200, Nicolas CANIART wrote: > I'm going to package the following python module I need: > python-django-gerbi-cms  (http://packages.python.org/django-page-cms/) > > I would like to now whether I should file an RFP or ITP bug report since I am > no debian maintai

Re: ITP or RFP

2011-05-23 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello Nicolas, On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 15:43, Nicolas CANIART wrote: > Hi, > >   I'm going to package the following python module I need: >     python-django-gerbi-cms  (http://packages.python.org/django-page-cms/) Would you like to maintain it under DPMT[1] umbrella? [1] http://wiki.debian.org

ITP or RFP

2011-05-23 Thread Nicolas CANIART
Hi,   I'm going to package the following python module I need:     python-django-gerbi-cms  (http://packages.python.org/django-page-cms/)   I would like to now whether I should file an RFP or ITP bug report since I am no debian maintainer and if, when the package is ready, someone could sponsor m