* Jakub Wilk , 2013-03-23, 13:37:
I'll do mass-commit to switch to anonscm.d.o
Done!
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130505164516.
On 03/24/2013 01:16 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Dmitrijs Ledkovs , 2013-03-23, 13:01:
>>> Okay. Unless I hear objections, I'll do mass-commit to switch to
>>> anonscm.d.o in ~2 weeks.
>> Can you do such commit simply after wheezy is out the door?
>
> I don't mind if we release in two weeks. ;P
>
Sure
* Dmitrijs Ledkovs , 2013-03-23, 13:01:
Okay. Unless I hear objections, I'll do mass-commit to switch to
anonscm.d.o in ~2 weeks.
Can you do such commit simply after wheezy is out the door?
I don't mind if we release in two weeks. ;P
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-r
On 23 March 2013 12:37, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Dmitry Shachnev , 2013-03-23, 15:51:
>
>>> I use svn.d.o everywhere, I don't like the new ones. However, the thing I
>>> don't like much more is inconsistency: some packages use svn.d.o, some
>>> anonscm.d.o, and some mixture of the two... Ugh. I don't
* Dmitry Shachnev , 2013-03-23, 15:51:
I use svn.d.o everywhere, I don't like the new ones. However, the
thing I don't like much more is inconsistency: some packages use
svn.d.o, some anonscm.d.o, and some mixture of the two... Ugh. I don't
mind switching if we switch everything at once. I'm ha
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Thanks for bringing up this subject.
>
> I use svn.d.o everywhere, I don't like the new ones. However, the thing I
> don't like much more is inconsistency: some packages use svn.d.o, some
> anonscm.d.o, and some mixture of the two... Ugh. I don'
On Sunday 17 March 2013 22:56:15 Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Ugh. I don't mind switching if we switch everything at once.
I started to switch my packages to get rid of the warning, but if the team
wants to keep svn.d.o I will revert the changes.
> I'm happy to make the mass-commit if there's consensus t
Thanks for bringing up this subject.
* Dmitry Shachnev , 2013-03-14, 17:56:
So let's do a quick poll:
[1a] I used anonscm.debian.org, and like it.
[1b] I used svn.debian.org, but like the new URIs and will switch.
[2a] I used svn.debian.org, don't like the new URIs but I don't mind switching.
2013/3/14 Thomas Kluyver :
> On 14 March 2013 14:01, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> If someone wants to go through and automatically change svn. -> anonscm.,
> that's fine. I'm mildly against having a Lintian rule for it, because it
> just seems like yet another gotcha to catch out new packagers.
Same
Den 14. mars 2013 15:01, skreiv Scott Kitterman:
3. Don't care to invest any thought or time in the question. Scott K
Agreed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.d
On Mar 14, 2013, at 02:06 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
>That's pretty much my thinking.
>
>If someone wants to go through and automatically change svn. -> anonscm.,
>that's fine. I'm mildly against having a Lintian rule for it, because it
>just seems like yet another gotcha to catch out new packagers
On 14 March 2013 13:56, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We discussed new lintian vcs-field-not-canonical check in IRC last week,
> which affects *lots* of packages in our SVN (see [¹]). Now people are
> recommended to use `svn://anonscm.debian.org/*` URIs instead of
> `svn://svn.debian.org/*`, bu
On 14 March 2013 14:01, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> 3. Don't care to invest any thought or time in the question.
That's pretty much my thinking.
If someone wants to go through and automatically change svn. -> anonscm.,
that's fine. I'm mildly against having a Lintian rule for it, because it
just
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> 3. Don't care to invest any thought or time in the question.
I found myself incredibly in agreement with Scott on this. I just cut
& paste from my other packages the URI and change what needs to be
changed, the rest I don't care.
--
San
On Thursday, March 14, 2013 05:56:47 PM Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We discussed new lintian vcs-field-not-canonical check in IRC last week,
> which affects *lots* of packages in our SVN (see [¹]). Now people are
> recommended to use `svn://anonscm.debian.org/*` URIs instead of
> `svn://svn.d
Hi,
We discussed new lintian vcs-field-not-canonical check in IRC last week,
which affects *lots* of packages in our SVN (see [¹]). Now people are
recommended to use `svn://anonscm.debian.org/*` URIs instead of
`svn://svn.debian.org/*`, but it seems that it's not what most packages
use at the mome
16 matches
Mail list logo
