On Thursday, March 14, 2013 05:56:47 PM Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi, > > We discussed new lintian vcs-field-not-canonical check in IRC last week, > which affects *lots* of packages in our SVN (see [¹]). Now people are > recommended to use `svn://anonscm.debian.org/*` URIs instead of > `svn://svn.debian.org/*`, but it seems that it's not what most packages > use at the moment. > > So let's do a quick poll: > > [1a] I used anonscm.debian.org, and like it. > [1b] I used svn.debian.org, but like the new URIs and will switch. > > [2a] I used svn.debian.org, don't like the new URIs but I don't mind > switching. [2b] I used svn.debian.org, and will continue to use it, lintian > should allow that. [2c] I used anonscm.debian.org, but don't like it. > > (I hope I've covered all options, let me know if there is something not > listed above. If you had different packages that used different URIs, > vote for the variant that applies to the biggest part of your packages.) > > If the second group will win, we should consider asking lintian > developers to remove that check (at least partially, i.e. allow both > options but not allow everything else). > > My own vote: [2a]. > > [¹]: http://lintian.debian.org/tags/vcs-field-not-canonical.html
3. Don't care to invest any thought or time in the question. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1732701.z9LrCrChi9@scott-latitude-e6320
