Request to join DPMT

Hi everyone! I have agreed with Jakub to take over python-docutils and I'm currently preparing the first revision of the 0.11 release. I'd therefore like to be added to the Modules Team. My username on Alioth is michi. Thanks in advance! Cheers, Michael signature.asc Description: Digital sig

Re: docutils: 0.6, rst2man/rst2odt obsoleted, RFH

On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 02:25:49AM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > I've been updating python-docutils to version 0.6. This version includes > the separate man page and ODT writers that were previously packaged by Ben > Finney and Michael Schutte, so I've made it conflict/provide/

Re: Package names for docutils writers

On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 05:58:59PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Michael Schutte writes: > > > It might make sense to wait a little longer for these uploads: Piotr > > takes care of python-docutils’ conversion to python-support (from > > -central) > > I am waitin

Re: Package names for docutils writers

Hi again, On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 02:26:13PM +0100, Michael Schutte wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:36:38AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > Let's give the discussion a week of elapsed time (Michael's original > > message has the field ‘Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:55:03 +

Re: Package names for docutils writers

s on go about doing that, exactly? I don’t think that this is strictly necessary, but it can’t hurt. As far as I can tell, simply uploading the renamed package to NEW should do. ftp-master’s cruft_report.py seems to search for duplicate binary packages for this reason. Cheers, -- Michael Schutte signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Package names for docutils writers

r-website > rest2web > docutils-writer-sphinx > sphinx python-sphinx and rest2web don’t publicly enhance docutils (which is another thing that might be worth changing). At the moment it’s really just us three. So, Chris, what do you think? :-) Cheers, -- Michael Schutte signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Package names for docutils writers

o includes a directory called odpwriter to write presentation files. If I split this up cleanly, I’d end up with four small binary packages (plus a transitional dummy one if there is renaming). I’m not sure whether this is desirable. Best regards, -- Michael Schutte signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Package names for docutils writers

“python-docutils-X”: it’s short, reasonably precise and explanatory. How do you think these packages should be called? Any input is welcome, even if it’s just “it doesn’t matter.” [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.bugs.rc/174522/focus=367728 Cheers, -- Michael Schutte

Re: [python-odtwriter] package name wrong?

p to python-docutils, which probably would have avoided that bug report in the first place. Cheers, -- Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [python-odtwriter] package name wrong?

ould still make sense to me, but that’s a bit bulky. Ccing debian-python to get some more opinions. Thanks for your comment, -- Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature