On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:36:38AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Chris Lamb <la...@debian.org> writes: > > Ah, I like this. We all agreed? > > So far, yes. > > Let's give the discussion a week of elapsed time (Michael's original > message has the field ‘Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:55:03 +0100’) to > allow other potential contributions a chance to appear. If there are > no substantive changes needed by next Wednesday, I think we should > call it the consensus and do it.
Fine. > Speaking of which, does this mean the source packages should be > renamed? How does on go about doing that, exactly? I don’t think that this is strictly necessary, but it can’t hurt. As far as I can tell, simply uploading the renamed package to NEW should do. ftp-master’s cruft_report.py seems to search for duplicate binary packages for this reason. Cheers, -- Michael Schutte <mi...@uiae.at>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
