Re: Unable to set custom test command for pybuild

2024-10-31 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
l syntax. It would have been more clear if it included examples: "--test-custom" can be set as "PYBUILD_TEST_CUSTOM", for example. In any case, I have figured it out now. Finally. ;-) Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Re: Unable to set custom test command for pybuild

2024-10-31 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Julian, On Thu, 2024-10-31 at 17:57 +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 06:22:45PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > (Please CC me as I'm not subscribed to this list) > > > > Hello, > > > > I need to override the standard

Unable to set custom test command for pybuild

2024-10-31 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
go. I tried setting it via "export PYBUILD_OPTION=" but that didn't work. Does anyone have any idea? Thanks, Adrian > [1] https://manpages.debian.org/testing/dh-python/pybuild.1.en.html -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `'

Request to join Python team on Salsa

2022-11-25 Thread John Goerzen
original author of Pygopherd, and it is now compatible with Python 3. I would like to re-introduce it to Debian, as part of the team. Thanks, John

Re: Safest way to set python3 as default for `python`

2018-07-18 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 16 July 2018 at 08:44, Bastian Venthur wrote: > Hi, > > sorry if this question has been asked before. What is the currently > recommended way to make `python` point to `python3`? I'd like to have it set > on a system default level if possible. > To answer your question. Create a brand new vir

Re: Moving off of git-dpm

2017-02-16 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 16 February 2017 at 11:31, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > Are you guys seriously considering dgit to replace anything other than > dput in DPMT? I'd rather go back to svn-buildpackage than use something > that will not allow me (f.e. as sponsor) to review before uploading! One can totally review bef

Re: Package name for github.com/miguelgrinberg/python-socketio

2016-08-02 Thread John Mark Vandenberg
ent. Which could actually be a good thing, as the main "socketio" author isn't currently maintaining their package: https://github.com/abourget/gevent-socketio/commit/1c84627980c0b77f8f9005fdbcc916ca33d0e4d1 -- John Vandenberg

Re: pybuild sphinxdoc and extensions

2015-10-23 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
i knew it! there are three identical twins of Piotr. No wonder they get so much done! On 23 October 2015 at 15:22, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Piotr Ożarowski, 2015-10-23] >> [Piotr Ożarowski, 2015-10-23] >> > override_dh_auto_build: >> > dh_auto_build >> > PYTHONPATH=$(CURDIR)/.pybuild/b

Re: admins elections

2015-10-01 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 1 October 2015 at 19:44, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > [Barry Warsaw, 2015-10-01] > > Team members can have more of a say --and more confidence in-- how the team > > is > > run. If you elect someone to a leadership role, you're giving your support > > to > > them to make the tough decisions. A

Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-09-30 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 30 September 2015 at 10:26, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 01:53 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> This has driven >> some contributors away in the past, thinking we don't have team spirit. >> IMO, that's truth, and this kind of thread is hurting again. > > Just to back this up: wa

Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make "prohibition" optional?

2015-07-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 27 July 2015 at 21:31, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >> > I already followed Dimitri's suggestion to add no_proxy=localhost and >> > will add your PYBUILD_FAKE_PROXY later today >> >> awesome! feel free to tune the name to whatever you feel more appropriate. > > I simply do not forward empty http{,s}

Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make "prohibition" optional?

2015-07-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 21 July 2015 at 20:17, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > talking about this ;-) : > > $> grep -A3 http_proxy pybuild > if 'http_proxy' not in env: > env['http_proxy'] = 'http://127.0.0.1:9/' > if 'https_proxy' not in env: > env['https_proxy'] = 'https://127.0.0.1:9/' > > which

Re: -nspkg.pth and .pth files - should we get rid of them?

2015-07-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 20 July 2015 at 13:04, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 07:58:13 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > >> On Jul 20, 2015, at 01:12 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: >> >> >Is that a serious question? Why should debian-python, for no good >> >reason, break things that work just fine? >> >> Becau

Re: -nspkg.pth and .pth files - should we get rid of them?

2015-07-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 20 July 2015 at 09:00, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:56:55 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > >> [Julien Cristau, 2015-07-20] >> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 21:28:32 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >> > >> > > Should we patch distutils/setuptools to not generate them? It generates

Re: /usr/bin/python in Python 2 and 3

2015-04-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
#!/usr/bin/python32 For bilingual scripts. On 17 Apr 2015 2:30 pm, "Geoffrey Thomas" wrote: > I've written up the proposal I made a few days ago for a /usr/bin/python > launcher that keeps the API of being Python 2, but lets scripts opt in to > running on Python 3: > > https://ldpreload.com/blog

Re: Python 2 d-d-a proposal

2015-04-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I am happy to help porting things. I did it for a number of non trivial packages and happy to do more. It's very soothing experience and better than knitting & sudoku. On 15 Apr 2015 2:29 pm, "Paul Tagliamonte" wrote: > Heyya d-p, > > I'd like to send an email to d-d-a asking that project to cons

Re: multiprocessing.queues.Queue does not work in pbuilder?

2015-01-31 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Hello, On 29 January 2015 at 09:01, Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to get the release candidate for python-astropy > packaged. The packaging includes a number of tests, where many fail in > pbuilder, which can be traced back to: > > $ sudo pbuilder login > # apt-get install python > #

Re: Age of built packages to be part of the jessie release?

2014-12-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Following on this conversation. I did some simple stats. There are 6361 binary packages that have the same name in stable and testing on (all, amd64) architecture. This translates into 4821 source packages. Skimming through the list of them, I've poked some that for sure will generate a diff if re

Re: Keeping upstream commits separate from Debian packaging commits

2014-10-17 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 17 October 2014 16:57, Tristan Seligmann wrote: > On 17 October 2014 17:19, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> There are different tag types in git. "Soft" are just named commit >> references and indeed can be renamed at will / point to new commits, >> however signe

Re: Keeping upstream commits separate from Debian packaging commits

2014-10-17 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 17 October 2014 07:39, Tristan Seligmann wrote: > On 16 October 2014 20:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >> >> Tristan Seligmann wrote: >>> If you are fetching the upstream revisions / tags into your packaging >>> repository, you can use the upstream tag exactly as-is, no need to >>> re-ta

Re: Fighting commit storm madness (was: [Python-modules-commits] [python-mplexporter] 135/135: Merge pull request #30 from rainwoodman/patch-1)

2014-10-09 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 9 October 2014 20:57, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On October 9, 2014 10:43:38 AM EDT, Barry Warsaw wrote: >>On Oct 09, 2014, at 10:19 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >>>Upstream commits are off topic. >> >>Agreed. There's no reason why we need notifications of upstream >>commits, >>though I don't

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

2014-08-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 6 August 2014 14:18, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Aug 06, 2014, at 08:47 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > >>(That said I'm also rather annoyed by the fact that the team hasn't switched >>to git yet.) > > We've had these discussions on this mailing list before, but I think we should > discuss it at Debc

Re: Setting DPMT as maintainer for python-repoze.what

2014-05-23 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 22 May 2014 02:15, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi Dimitri (and the rest of the DPMT), > > I'm uploading a new version of python-repoze.what with some maintenance > work. I've set DPMT as maintainer, and you and I as uploaders. I don't > really care about this particular package, but thought it was

Bug#746741: release.debian.org: dh-python2 transition

2014-05-02 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Dear release team, Debian python teams would find useful to evaluate on continuous basis removal of python-support from the archive and thus migrating to dh-python2. We are uncertain of the scope, and the pace at which this transition can be completed.

Re: Getting rid of python-support?

2014-04-30 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 30 April 2014 18:27, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Dimitri John Ledkov , 2014-04-30, 16:43: > >>> python-central is gone (\o/) and python-support usage is slowly >>> decreasing in the archive: >>> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dh_pysupport-is-obsolete.html >>&

Re: Getting rid of python-support?

2014-04-30 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 30 April 2014 18:01, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 30.04.2014 17:31, schrieb Luca Falavigna: >> Hi, >> >> python-central is gone (\o/) and python-support usage is slowly >> decreasing in the archive: >> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dh_pysupport-is-obsolete.html >> >> Do you think it would be the

Re: Getting rid of python-support?

2014-04-30 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 30 April 2014 16:31, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Hi, > > python-central is gone (\o/) and python-support usage is slowly > decreasing in the archive: > http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dh_pysupport-is-obsolete.html > > Do you think it would be the right time to prepare a mass bug filing > asking to c

Re: Some thoughts about py{support,central} -> dh_python2 conversion

2014-04-20 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 12 November 2013 15:08, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Jakub Wilk , 2012-05-03, 21:41: > >>> 2) Do not skip the "Before you begin"[0] step. This is very important: if >>> two packages share a namespace, either both or none of them must use >>> python-support. Also, it's not enough just to convert them a

Re: RFS: Pyspread 0.2.6-1

2014-02-19 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 19 February 2014 15:45, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Feb 18, 2014, at 09:10 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: > >>I don't really know how autopkgtests work, but if they're run >>automatically during the build process like dh_auto_test, then that >>would cause your package to FTBFS. Can you modify the tests

Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same

2014-01-25 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 25 January 2014 17:21, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> Huh? Thomas seemed to be doing the right thing per the DPMT standards >> etc; > > if you change the python helper, you HAVE TO contact who's maintaining > the package and have they ack the change, that's the team standard. > No, one does not within

Re: Using git-svn and gbp for DPMT - Was: Re: Joining the DPMT and git.debian.org access

2014-01-21 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 15 January 2014 02:29, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:51:20PM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote: >> Now, if you both want to track upstream sources from origin/master on >> local upstream/ branch and svn's trunk on local master branch, then, >> yes, a debian/gbp.conf comes handy,

Re: Fw: [Debian Wiki] Update of "Python/LibraryStyleGuide" by FedericoCeratto

2013-12-28 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 28 December 2013 06:27, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 12/28/2013 01:00 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> OK, I'm sorry. >> >> What does it mean a "clean backport" vs other type of backports? >> dh-python is in backports, so no changes are required to

Re: Fw: [Debian Wiki] Update of "Python/LibraryStyleGuide" by FedericoCeratto

2013-12-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 27 December 2013 16:08, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Dimitri John Ledkov's message of 2013-12-27 07:18:05 -0800: >> On 27 December 2013 15:00, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> > On 12/17/2013 01:02 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> Y

Re: Fw: [Debian Wiki] Update of "Python/LibraryStyleGuide" by FedericoCeratto

2013-12-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 27 December 2013 15:00, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 12/17/2013 01:02 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> [...] >> You'll want to have at least the following build dependencies: >> >>* debhelper (>= 8) >> - * dh-python >>* python-all (>= 2.6.6-3~) >>* python-setuptools >>* python3-all >

Re: pybuild and not always preventing network connection in auto tests

2013-12-11 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 11 December 2013 15:33, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > On 11 December 2013 15:24, Olivier Berger > wrote: >> Hi. >> >> AFAIU, pybuild prevents accesses to the network. >> >> But this can be problematic during auto_tests that will perform HTTP >> conne

Re: pybuild and not always preventing network connection in auto tests

2013-12-11 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 11 December 2013 15:24, Olivier Berger wrote: > Hi. > > AFAIU, pybuild prevents accesses to the network. > > But this can be problematic during auto_tests that will perform HTTP > connections on a local HTTP server (I have such an example in rdflib's > auto tests [0]). > > Is there a way to avo

Re: RFS: DPMT: python-hl7 0.2.0

2011-07-13 Thread John Paulett
Andreas--thanks for reviewing and uploading the package. I changed the distribution to "unstable" and svn tagged the upload. On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:43:39AM -0500, John Paulett wrote: >> >> In regards to the

Re: RFS: DPMT: python-hl7 0.2.0

2011-07-13 Thread John Paulett
Jakub, I corrected debian/copyright in subversion (the parsing error on was caused by empty lines inside the license). I also corrected the License short name. As I am packaging novice, please advise if this warrants an new upload. Thank you, John On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Jakub Wilk

Re: RFS: DPMT: python-hl7 0.2.0

2011-07-13 Thread John Paulett
you again! John On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi John, > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:12:46AM -0500, John Paulett wrote: >> I am the upstream maintainer of python-hl7 [1] and have packaged it >> for Debian.  I was hoping that a DD may be able to revie

RFS: DPMT: python-hl7 0.2.0

2011-07-13 Thread John Paulett
] https://github.com/johnpaulett/python-hl7 [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/python-hl7/trunk/ Thank you, John Paulett j...@paulett.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

Re: Request for review / sponsorship for jsonpickle

2009-12-14 Thread John Paulett
=details;package=jsonpickle I would greatly appreciate any comments or suggestions, and eventually sponsorship. Thank you! John Paulett j...@paulett.org On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Jan Dittberner wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 04:26:49PM -0600, John Paulett wrote: >> Hello

Request for membership in python-modules team (was Request for review / sponsorship for jsonpickle)

2009-12-14 Thread John Paulett
her python modules in Debian. Thank you, John Paulett j...@paulett.org On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:20 AM, Jan Dittberner wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 04:26:49PM -0600, John Paulett wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I uploaded my first Debian package, jsonpickle, to mentors.debian.org >&g

Request for review / sponsorship for jsonpickle

2009-12-13 Thread John Paulett
acceptable. I am one of the upstream maintainers of this package. Thank you, John Paulett j...@paulett.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Bonjourno. These Lonely women want some hot lovin,...,,cahoot conakry

2006-02-15 Thread mukasa john
i m a lonely young man at university offering law as principle course i really want one serious woman to be in my company Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!

Re: [Distutils] formencode as .egg in Debian ??

2005-11-22 Thread John J Lee
because Debian policy > mandates a certain naming scheme for packages, giving the > FormEncode package a name of python2.4-formencode. Why does any of that block distributors from using egg dependency info? John

Re: [Distutils] formencode as .egg in Debian ??

2005-11-22 Thread John J Lee
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, John J Lee wrote: [...] > Actually, I believe this is the eventual primary intended mode of > operation of eggs. In that case, the necessary sys.path manipulation is > handled either by setuptools' wrapper scripts / wrapper .exe files calling > require(versio

Re: [Distutils] formencode as .egg in Debian ??

2005-11-22 Thread John J Lee
es > >are packages, and eggs are not? > > I don't understand you. [...] I can only assume Martin is reading 'package' to mean 'a unit of software distribution' rather than 'a Python package'. John

Re: [Distutils] formencode as .egg in Debian ??

2005-11-22 Thread John J Lee
problem(s)? It seems at least two distributions are already actively moving towards use of Python Eggs, so it would be good to inform those distributors of any problem you see before they get too far. John

Re: Release Team meeting minutes - 2005-06-18

2005-06-20 Thread John Goerzen
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:03:05AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * John Goerzen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050620 05:47]: > > Not everyone can be in an IRC discussion. There are pesky things like > > sleep, work, and Real Life that mean that it's not possible for > > everyon

Re: Release Team meeting minutes - 2005-06-18

2005-06-19 Thread John Goerzen
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 04:39:23AM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote: > Andreas Barth wrote: > > Ok, convinced. No more minutes to debian-release. If we want to present > > properly, we need to take time to polish the mails. Minutes will be > > hidden in future to avoid misunderstandings. I hope that you'

Bug#305461: O: gnupginterface

2005-04-19 Thread John Goerzen
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I am orphaning this package. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.9 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Seeking a good home for OfflineIMAP

2004-11-12 Thread John Goerzen
d (I think) easy to work with. With one exception: the IMAP communication code. And that is because it has to use imaplib, which doesn't lend itself very well to, erm, clean code :-) If you're interested, I'd encourage you to sign up[2] for the offlineimap list and post there, so w

Re: [OT] Free Python book for reviewers

2004-08-26 Thread John Goerzen
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 04:39:24PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > My recent book, Foundations of Python Network Programming[1], has just I always forget the link. Sorry. [1] http://changelog.complete.org/articles/2004/08/25/foundations-of-python-network-programming/

[OT] Free Python book for reviewers

2004-08-26 Thread John Goerzen
r name on to APress. Apologies for taking up 1K of your mailbox. -- John

ANN: Pycaml for Debian

2004-02-24 Thread John Goerzen
. Python programmers will find it similar to the Jython system for Java. Enjoy. -- John

Re: Python transition

2003-10-07 Thread John Goerzen
es, I depend on the specific version of Python that I will be using (ie, python2.3) and the appropriate libs for that version of Python. Is Python 2.3 already in testing, but the python package simply isn't updated? -- John

Re: Python transition

2003-10-07 Thread John Goerzen
hich is nice, but still does not explain why the freeze is necessary. I don't understand the reason for it. > Unfortunately I did not get any response from you asking for NMU's for > forg and gnupginterface. I don't recall getting messages from you about that, but I will look into it right away. -- John

Python transition

2003-10-07 Thread John Goerzen
ny bugs, and just go on with life. -- John

Re: python transition summary

2003-08-25 Thread John Belmonte
.2" | sort Also, I think every item in the TODO list should have an associated bug report. The bugs often already exist but the TODO items simply are not annotated. I may be able to assist with the annotation. Regards, -John Belmonte

Re: python 2.2 -> python 2.3 transition

2003-08-13 Thread John Goerzen
o quibble with that approach. If libwxgtk2.4-python took that approach, I'd have no complaints as I could still install and use the lib under Python 2.2. As it is, that is impossible, even though the lib remains compatible with Python 2.2. -- John

Re: python 2.2 -> python 2.3 transition

2003-08-12 Thread John Goerzen
tils, > though ;-) (*hint*) Actually, all that have that are now uninstallable. Some important ones have that, such as libwxgtk2.4-python. Shouldn't they depend on python2.2 instead? -- John

#!/usr/bin/python2.3 vs #!/usr/bin/env python2.3

2003-08-11 Thread John Goerzen
prior to the system's, and it doesn't necessarily have requisite libraries for the programs being run. Any opinions? -- John

Re: Bug#195846: python2.2: Core-dumps when files get large

2003-06-02 Thread John Goerzen
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:56:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > That are 18MB, not 1,8GB. Oops. > Without a stack trace, there is not much to do ... Here you go: #0 0x0fd90454 in exit () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x0fd9044c in exit () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x0ff79884 in __pthread_sighandler (

ANN: Pyme -- Python OO interface to GPGME

2002-11-19 Thread John Goerzen
Thought some of you may be interested in this -- it's hit ftp-master now, and is just waiting for approval. Comments welcome :-) It's taken a good deal of work, but I like it. - Forwarded message from John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PR

Re: Question for the transition

2001-09-04 Thread John Goerzen
files. I cannot fathom what difference deleting and reinstalling .py files could possibly make. -- John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>GPG: 0x8A1D9A1Fwww.complete.org

Stackless Python?

2001-08-30 Thread John Goerzen
Has this been packaged? Are there any plans to do so? -- John

[no subject]

2001-05-22 Thread John
Hey there, I found a great retail site with all kinds of products. Home decor, office decor, travel, outdoors, kitchen, etc... Take a look around at http://www.merchandisewholesale.com just click on the images of the product to enlarge it for a better view. Sincerely, John

Re: Packaging of more zope products

2000-02-17 Thread John Goerzen
Yes, there is squishdot, which I maintain. More may happen but it's just that new zope packages are appearing faster than people care to package them, I think. Since it's fairly easy to install most Zope packages, anyway. Christian Leutloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > for ZOPE exists

pyOpengl

1999-06-20 Thread John Travers
Has anyone packaged this? I really need it. -- John Travers "Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us!"

what apt line?

1999-06-20 Thread John Travers
What line should I put in apt-sources to get the packages from www.debian.org/~flight/... thanks -- John Travers "Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us!"