Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-06 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Brian May's message of 2017-03-06 12:30:56 +1100: > The concept to convert from git-dpm to gbp pq is very very easy: > > 1. Delete debian/.git-dpm > 2. Unapply all patches. > 3. Commit and push. > > (repeat for all branches on all repositories) > > Step 2 is easier said then d

Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-03 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2017-03-04 04:37:16 +0100: > On 03/03/2017 04:09 PM, Allison Randal wrote: > > On 03/03/2017 08:01 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> Could you please put this on hold? It's possible that I resume my work > >> on OpenStack packages (though I can't disclose anyt

Re: Best practice for adding python3 version to existing module with helper programs?

2016-06-23 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Neil Muller's message of 2016-06-24 00:26:25 +0200: > I'm working on packaging the latest version of sqlobject, which adds > supprt for python 3, and I'm unsure of how best to handle the helper > applications that ship as part of the package. The helper applications > will work with b

Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same

2014-01-31 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Piotr Ożarowski's message of 2014-01-31 02:05:43 -0800: > [Vincent Bernat, 2014-01-31] > > Sandro has orphaned python-concurrent.futures: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736714 > > sorry to see that, unfortunately people who do something also have to > have thic

Re: Fw: [Debian Wiki] Update of "Python/LibraryStyleGuide" by FedericoCeratto

2013-12-27 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Dimitri John Ledkov's message of 2013-12-27 07:18:05 -0800: > On 27 December 2013 15:00, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > On 12/17/2013 01:02 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > >> [...] > >> You'll want to have at least the following build dependencies: > >> > >>* debhelper (>= 8) > >> - * dh

Re: GUI tool for packaging

2012-11-14 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Thomas Kluyver's message of 2012-11-09 05:19:03 -0800: > This is an idea I've had knocking around for a while. Packaging is complex > - there are lots of different tools and syntaxes you have to understand to > do a good job of it - quilt, debhelper, watch files, etc. - along with > s

Re: RFS: python-translitcodec , python-mongokit

2012-02-10 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Jakub Wilk's message of Sun Jan 29 05:34:23 -0800 2012: > * Clint Byrum , 2012-01-28, 15:04: > >>scripts/update_table.py tries to call sys.exit(), though it never > >>imports sys. > >> > >>It should be: > >> &g

Fwd: Re: Copyright and License status of "transtab"

2012-01-31 Thread Clint Byrum
s below. Would including the text and headers of said reply in the debian/copyright file be sufficient to meet the DFSG? I tend to think they would be, but would appreciate a +1 from those who know better than I. Thank you! --- Begin forwarded message from Markus Kuhn --- From: Markus Kuhn To: Clint B

Re: RFS: python-translitcodec , python-mongokit

2012-01-28 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Jakub Wilk's message of Sat Jan 28 04:00:06 -0800 2012: > * Clint Byrum , 2012-01-28, 00:52: > >I've pushed python-translitcodec and python-mongokit into the SVN > >repository. > > translitcodec looks interesting. (Though I don't intend to

RFS: python-translitcodec , python-mongokit

2012-01-28 Thread Clint Byrum
Hi everyone! I've pushed python-translitcodec and python-mongokit into the SVN repository. I believe them to be ready for upload. They're a dependency of an application I'm packaging, Mediagoblin, so having them is a blocker for that. It would be quite helpful if somebody could sponsor them. -

Policy page is out of date with actual policy

2012-01-28 Thread Clint Byrum
It had been a while since I added a package to SVN, so I went hunting for the procedure and somehow ended up here: http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/python-modules-policy.html This led me to follow the perl modules procedure, which uses -l 2, and no -o. This meant I put my modules in the w

RFS: txzookeeper

2011-06-08 Thread Clint Byrum
Hello, I am writing to request sponsorship of a NEW package, txzookeeper 0.2.1+bzr39-1 into Debian. I've added it to the DPMT tree, and uploaded it to mentors.debian.net (which is apparently having trouble right now). Anyway, the package can be viewed in SVN here: http://anonscm.debian.org/view

Re: python sample packages?

2010-11-08 Thread Clint Byrum
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 17:35 -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Nov 08, 2010, at 04:16 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > >there is also py2dsc from python-stdeb if we go for automation (I've > >not tried it yet though :-/) > > While I'm a big fan of python-stdeb, I should also point out that at UDS-

Re: Deadline for 10.10 updates?

2010-09-22 Thread Clint Byrum
On Sep 22, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Tim Michelsen wrote: > When is the last date to submit an updated package? > Ubuntu 10.10 is in FinalFreeze: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FinalFreeze > The Version of the Spyder Science IDE to be included in 10.10 is very > outdated: > http://packages.ubuntu.com/maver

Re: Python packaging, dependencies, upstream facilities

2010-09-21 Thread Clint Byrum
On Sep 21, 2010, at 3:26 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Simon McVittie, 2010-09-21] >> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 at 10:30:33 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >>> I see only one sane way to fix the problem - changing Python interpreter >>> to recognize API from filenames, like foo.1.py foo.2.py foo.2.3.py >

Re: Will DPMT be ok maintaining a package that could potentially build other language bindings?

2010-07-30 Thread Clint Byrum
[bump] Anybody? On Jul 27, 2010, at 1:37 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > So I recently uploaded python-libgearman into the svn repository, but bzed > pointed out that it didn't build from the swig bindings, and so really wasn't > acceptable to upload to Debian. > > I agree

Will DPMT be ok maintaining a package that could potentially build other language bindings?

2010-07-27 Thread Clint Byrum
So I recently uploaded python-libgearman into the svn repository, but bzed pointed out that it didn't build from the swig bindings, and so really wasn't acceptable to upload to Debian. I agree, and now I have a source package that builds from the upstream swig sources, but this begs the questio

Re: Hello DPMT!

2010-07-07 Thread Clint Byrum
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 12:21 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Welcome to the team, I've added you some seconds ago. > Please make sure you read our policy > http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/python-modules-policy.html > before committing to the svn. > > For sponsoring requests and general discus

RFS: python-libgearman

2010-06-30 Thread Clint Byrum
man/python-libgearman_0.13.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Clint Byrum -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: htt

Hello DPMT!

2010-06-30 Thread Clint Byrum
Hello DPMT... I'm Clint, I work for Canonical, and I want to help! :) I am interested in joining the DPMT, in part to improve python module support for server applications in Debian and Ubuntu. Specifically I'd like to start by helping to facilitate the upload and maintenance of python-libgearma