evelopers and would probably have to join DPMT to
carry on with the ZRK package maintenance.
>
> Cheers,
> -Barry
>
> ___
> pkg-zope-developers mailing list
> pkg-zope-develop...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-zope-deve
ld
require an argument which must match with a randomly generated string.
That way only the NSA could ever actually use the option as only they
own all the random numbers.
--
Brian Sutherland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/20140326161329.GA25017@Brians-MacBook-Air.local
://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/releases/packages-2.0a1.html
where possible
Any help with that agenda would be appreciated :)
--
Brian Sutherland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.de
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:07:28PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Brian Sutherland , 2012-05-10, 10:36:
> >AFAIK, the problem is double build failures because dpkg detects
> >that there are leftovers/changes from the first build. You end up
> >with failures when a second
ST.in. In that case deleting *.egg-info
causes missing files in the built package.
I think that most people here are arguing that "setup.py clean" should
cleanup all build products and get you back to some kind of pristine
state.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645
tup a testbed, or is there now an easy way to run the
tests?
* Do you run the tests against the code installed via the .deb
package or on the code in the unpacked source?
--
Brian Sutherland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:21:38PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2012, at 05:43 PM, Brian Sutherland wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:16:02AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >> On Jan 27, 2012, at 03:38 PM, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> >>
> >> &g
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:16:02AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2012, at 03:38 PM, Brian Sutherland wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:36:40AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >> What if we proposed a hook to get DEFAULT_VERSION from a file or
> >> envir
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 08:36:40AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2012, at 01:14 PM, Brian Sutherland wrote:
>
> >Extra bonus points for getting PJE to change the DEFAULT_VERSION in
> >setuptools trunk to something OK for most major distributions;)
>
> Here'
e.
Extra bonus points for getting PJE to change the DEFAULT_VERSION in
setuptools trunk to something OK for most major distributions;)
--
Brian Sutherland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
-central
> > > + B.5. CDBS
> >
> > changing these IDs might not be a good idea (think about all places
> > where they're referenced), why not adding dh_python* as B.5?
>
> I could, but it seemed odd to reference the non-deprecated tool after the
&g
d file so checkrestart works unchanged.
[1] http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0302/
--
Brian Sutherland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110620131053.GA12613@Boo.local
ckages, but I need to use a very
non-standard testrunner incantation to run the tests. I'm also forced to
install the tests.
Ideal would be some kind of standard:
$ pysetup test-installation
command which would run the tests from an unpacked sdist against an
installation which is expected
gt; modules, so I'm CCing the zope2.x uploaders directly to get involved with
> the packaging.
Of the list presented, we are only currently interested in
packaging zope.sendmail (See an earlier mail from me). The others have
very difficult dependencies or are semi-deprecated.
--
Brian Sutherland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
s:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zc.sourcerelease/
Personally, I prefer to manage Debian repositories and mirror them into
PYPI style indexes of eggs (or a set of buildout versions). Development
buildouts then use the PYPI index:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/van.reposync
--
Brian Sutherland
re-test the package
as the dependencies are upgraded.
> --
> Modularise. Use subroutines.
> - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
google SoC student busy trying to get things working on
python2.5. Apparently there's a lot of stuff that changed.
--
Brian Sutherland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.4. Did anybody ever try to run Zope in 2.5? If there's something not
> working, we should take care of it.
Did they ever actually run the tests then?
http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20070616.183425.b42a7509.en.html#zope-zodb-dev
That mail was just over a month ago.
--
Brian Suther
of your
package, but the bug still breaks your package.
I didn't spend enough time tracing the code to see whether it was
disutils or setuptools at fault.
--
Brian Sutherland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
irst time,
> that
> should solve your problem. I didn't look at your package, but that worked
> for me before for a similar issue.
I believe it needs to be on either the first or second line:
http://docs.python.org/ref/encodings.html
--
Brian Sutherland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
> 377329: normal: python2.3 -c 'int(buffer(__import__("array").array("c")))'
> segfaults
> 390152: normal: python2.3: logging module is broken
I've confirmed these 2 with python2.4 and reassigned them
--
Brian Sutherland
Metropolis - "it's
or python2.4 (and not above), so the same is needed for packages
> depending on zope3. You have two hints that a dependency on a
> unversioned python is unwanted:
>
> - XS-Python-Version is explicitely set
> - the package is named python2.4-xxx
FYI, in the schooltool packages for th
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 01:26:41AM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> It even uses python-support =D The code is on pkg-turbogears svn repo at
> alioth, and I'll upload it soonish, I hope.
>
> Comments?
Being a Zope-ish hacker myself, I'm very glad to have helped the
co
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 10:24:39PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> [...]
> > For what it's worth, I will be converting most of my packages that build
> > with setuptools to use option 3.
> >
> > That is, of
g most of my packages that build
with setuptools to use option 3.
That is, of course, until there is some kind of consenus/decision.
--
Brian Sutherland
Metropolis - "it's the first movie with a robot. And she's a woman.
And she's EVIL!!"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bout this, but I think this transition is one of the
things waiting for a sarge release.
--
Brian Sutherland
It's 10 minutes, 5 if you walk fast.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 08:32:50PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Brian Sutherland writes:
> > Seems most of the discussion on zope 3 happens on this mailing list, so
> > I'm putting my questions here.
> >
> > I'm currently packaging SchoolBell, what will
but Debian is
kind of lacking.
The package naming scheme I am thinking of using is:
schoolbell- Config and binaries for a schoolbell
standalone server
zope3.1-python2.3-schoolbell - The zope libraries themselves
Comments?
--
Brian
28 matches
Mail list logo
