Re: Two django packages for Debian?

2014-08-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Tue, 05 Aug 2014, Matthew Vernon wrote: > https://git.csx.cam.ac.uk/x/ucs/u/mcv21/django-grappelli.git > https://git.csx.cam.ac.uk/x/ucs/u/mcv21/django-stronghold.git [...] > Naturally, I'd like to upload these as maintained by > python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org. Is that going to

Re: Two django packages for Debian?

2014-08-05 Thread Brian May
On 6 August 2014 03:11, Matthew Vernon wrote: > I've packaged up django-grappelli and django-stronghold (since we have > need for them at work). I think my debianisations are sane, but I've > done them in git not subversion. Repos: > Please make sure these work with Django 1.7 in experimental...

Re: policy for source package names

2014-08-05 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Aug 05, 2014, at 04:09 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >I think it is a good practice to make the source package name the same as the >binary package name as long is there isn't a good reason to do otherwise. So >with any source package that produces one binary package, those names should >m

Re: policy for source package names

2014-08-05 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote: > > On 08/05/2014 12:04 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Antonio Valentino >> wrote: >>> Hi list, >>> I read in [1] and [2] that binary packages with public modules should >>> have the python- (or python3-) prefix in the name. >>> I'm

Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#756872: RM: gnupginterface -- ROM; No human maintainer left, dead upstream

2014-08-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sunday, August 03, 2014 22:01:00 Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > On Aug 02, 2014, at 06:23 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >>If someone on the team is interested in this package staying in Debian and > >>willing to be added to uploaders, please spea

Two django packages for Debian?

2014-08-05 Thread Matthew Vernon
Hi, I've packaged up django-grappelli and django-stronghold (since we have need for them at work). I think my debianisations are sane, but I've done them in git not subversion. Repos: https://git.csx.cam.ac.uk/x/ucs/u/mcv21/django-grappelli.git https://git.csx.cam.ac.uk/x/ucs/u/mcv21/django-stron

Re: policy for source package names

2014-08-05 Thread olivier.sal...@codeless.fr
On 08/05/2014 12:04 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: > On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Antonio Valentino > wrote: >> Hi list, >> I read in [1] and [2] that binary packages with public modules should >> have the python- (or python3-) prefix in the name. >> I'm wondering if the same naming rules should be

Re: Help needed to test packages with Django 1.7

2014-08-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 08/04/2014 11:30 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Aug 04, 2014, at 11:05 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> Well, I'm doing my best to add Python 3 support everywhere I can. > > \o/ > >> I've been doing this for months already. I know it wont be possible to fix >> everything. Currently, I have 2 bloc