On Sunday, August 03, 2014 22:01:00 Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Barry Warsaw <ba...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Aug 02, 2014, at 06:23 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >>If someone on the team is interested in this package staying in Debian and > >>willing to be added to uploaders, please speak up. I don't mind doing the > >>work to modernize the packaging, but don't care to be responsible for it > >>long term. > >> > > I personally don't think it's worth spending time on gnupginterface. We > > have the PyPI package python-gnupg in the archive and its upstream seems > > relatively active. I don't think we have gnupg 1.3.1 (top PyPI hit for > > "gnupg") and that has an even more recent PyPI release. I haven't looked > > at the latter, but I use the former in several projects, including Python > > 3 projects. > > FWIW, that 1.3.1 version is a fork of original python-gnupg. > > According to Github repo description [1], it is "a modified version of > python-gnupg, including security patches, extensive documentation, and > extra features". > > [1] https://github.com/isislovecruft/python-gnupg
Thanks for the feedback everyone. gnupginterface is removed from Unstable as of today. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1492557.LLhoBq6Xn3@scott-latitude-e6320
