Stuart Prescott writes:
> In the current copyright-format/1.0, people are including repackaging
> information with a Comment field, as an explanatory text to the Source
> field or with some other ad hoc field name.
By my reading of ‘copyright-format/1.0’ (the “Machine-readable
debian/copyright f
Hi Ben,
> I think adding a field to ‘debian/copyright’ for that purpose is a bad
> idea, so I am unlikely to incorporate that functionality into the
> document.
I'm sure you are aware that policy §12.5 requires the details of where
upstream sources were obtained from; that is commonly interpret
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:07:01PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > I have written https://wiki.debian.org/BenFinney/software/repack>,
> > do you think that is worth linking to (perhaps if I put it at a
> > different Wiki page) from the Python library style guide?
>
> Can you
Thanks for the feedback folks. I'm not sure it's going to be feasible to
collapse the non-Debian changelog entries - there have been a lot of uploads
to Ubuntu in the meantime. I don't know what I'm going to do yet, but it
seems like it's at least acceptable to leave them in or trim them. At lea
Hi Ben,
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:07:01PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > I was just thinking a link might be useful for folks landing on the
> > LibraryStyleGuide page, but I don't feel strongly about it.
>
> I have written https://wiki.debian.org/BenFinney/software/repack>,
> do you think that is
5 matches
Mail list logo
