Re: RFS: Fix for #678169 (python-mysqldb)

2013-03-14 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/15/2013 08:45 AM, Mika Pflüger wrote: > The release team just (reluctantly (-; ) pre-approved the fix [1], so it > would be really nice if you could upload to sid. > > Cheers, > > Mika Uploaded and sent to the SVN. Note that I also added: -rm -fr build build-python$* +rm -fr build bu

Re: RFS: Fix for #678169 (python-mysqldb)

2013-03-14 Thread Mika Pflüger
Hi, Am Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:29:03 +0800 schrieb Thomas Goirand : > On 03/12/2013 10:14 AM, Mika Pflüger wrote: > > The debdiff is attached to the bug [bug] and I would be very happy > > if someone could add the changes to the svn and upload to unstable; > > I'm offering to write the unblock request

Re: About canonical Vcs fields

2013-03-14 Thread Andreas Noteng
Den 14. mars 2013 15:01, skreiv Scott Kitterman: 3. Don't care to invest any thought or time in the question. Scott K Agreed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.d

Re: About canonical Vcs fields

2013-03-14 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 14, 2013, at 02:06 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: >That's pretty much my thinking. > >If someone wants to go through and automatically change svn. -> anonscm., >that's fine. I'm mildly against having a Lintian rule for it, because it >just seems like yet another gotcha to catch out new packagers

Re: About canonical Vcs fields

2013-03-14 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 14 March 2013 13:56, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi, > > We discussed new lintian vcs-field-not-canonical check in IRC last week, > which affects *lots* of packages in our SVN (see [¹]). Now people are > recommended to use `svn://anonscm.debian.org/*` URIs instead of > `svn://svn.debian.org/*`, bu

Re: About canonical Vcs fields

2013-03-14 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 14 March 2013 14:01, Scott Kitterman wrote: > 3. Don't care to invest any thought or time in the question. That's pretty much my thinking. If someone wants to go through and automatically change svn. -> anonscm., that's fine. I'm mildly against having a Lintian rule for it, because it just

Re: About canonical Vcs fields

2013-03-14 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > 3. Don't care to invest any thought or time in the question. I found myself incredibly in agreement with Scott on this. I just cut & paste from my other packages the URI and change what needs to be changed, the rest I don't care. -- San

Re: About canonical Vcs fields

2013-03-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, March 14, 2013 05:56:47 PM Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi, > > We discussed new lintian vcs-field-not-canonical check in IRC last week, > which affects *lots* of packages in our SVN (see [¹]). Now people are > recommended to use `svn://anonscm.debian.org/*` URIs instead of > `svn://svn.d

About canonical Vcs fields

2013-03-14 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Hi, We discussed new lintian vcs-field-not-canonical check in IRC last week, which affects *lots* of packages in our SVN (see [¹]). Now people are recommended to use `svn://anonscm.debian.org/*` URIs instead of `svn://svn.debian.org/*`, but it seems that it's not what most packages use at the mome