Hi Ben (2010.11.05_23:18:41_+0200)
> Is this common practise among sponsors?
It is for debian-python. I don't have any experience with other
SVN-using teams.
> If the above convention (the sponsor will change ‘UNRELEASED’ to the
> appropriate suite name before re-building) is common, is it docume
Moving this non-Python part of the discussion to ‘debian-mentors’.
Stefano Rivera writes:
> First, we don't tag releases until they are uploaded. You can leave the
> changelog entry as UNRELEASED, and the sponsor will fix that and tag on
> upload.
Is this common practise among sponsors?
I was
* Stefano Rivera , 2010-11-05, 21:46:
debian/rules: Not a fan of dh $...@?
FWIW, I have nothing against dh $@, but I'm opposed to abuse of %-rules.
#!/usr/bin/make -f
%:
dh $@
override_dh_auto_install:
dh_auto_install -- --install-lib /usr/share/d
On Nov 05, 2010, at 09:46 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
>#!/usr/bin/make -f
>%:
> dh $@
[...]
>
>For new packages, you should probably consider using dh_python2 instead
>of python-support. The eventual plan is to migrate all Python packages
>to it.
Which should be as easy as adding "--with pyth
Hi Daniel (2010.11.05_19:45:42_+0200)
> I'm kindly asking for overchecking/uploading of the following packages:
As a not-yet-DD I can't upload, but here's a review.
First, we don't tag releases until they are uploaded. You can leave the
changelog entry as UNRELEASED, and the sponsor will fix that
Hi people,
I'm kindly asking for overchecking/uploading of the following packages:
/python-apps/packages/didjvu/tags/0.2.1-1/ initial release of 0.2.1
/python-apps/packages/djvusmooth/tags/0.2.8-2/
/python-apps/packages/ocrodjvu/tags/0.4.6-3 closes important bug
#600539
6 matches
Mail list logo
