Hi Ben (2010.11.05_23:18:41_+0200) > Is this common practise among sponsors?
It is for debian-python. I don't have any experience with other SVN-using teams. > If the above convention (the sponsor will change ‘UNRELEASED’ to the > appropriate suite name before re-building) is common, is it documented > anywhere? No idea about documentation, I've just been told to do this on the IRC channel. The closest is: * After upload, tag the latest revision running svn-buildpackage --svn-tag-only into 'package-foo' directory. from http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/python-modules-policy.html Yes, it does mean the sponsoree has to state which suite is desired. But it saves on a lot of untagging and retagging in each round of review, and makes it a little easier to know the state of things when reading the repo. SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101105215758.gn29...@bach.rivera.co.za
