Re: Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
"Barry Warsaw" wrote: >On Jun 18, 2010, at 03:45 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > >>[Luca Falavigna, 2010-06-18] >>> Il 18/06/2010 14.37, Scott Kitterman ha scritto: >>> > XS-Python-Version: >= 2.x >>> > XS-Python3-Version: >= 3.x >> >>+1 (but with XB-Python-Version, i.e. no XB-Python3-Version) > >

Re: Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
"Luca Falavigna" wrote: >Il 18/06/2010 14.37, Scott Kitterman ha scritto: >> XS-Python-Version: >= 2.x >> XS-Python3-Version: >= 3.x >> >> This avoids any risk of existing packages inadvertently expressing support >> for >> a Python3 version, but adds more fields to debian/control (this woul

Re: Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-18 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 18, 2010, at 04:30 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: >Another reason against this would be that it will look stupid once there >is no Python 2 anymore. If it's one thing I've learned in all my years is that it's virtually impossible not to look stupid 10 or 15 years later . I mean, have you

Re: Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:37:32AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > The version of Python Policy that was just uploaded to unstable is the first > one that attempts to address Python3. It is just a start and more changes > are > needed. > > POX and I were just discussion this and discovered tha

Re: Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-18 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Luca Falavigna , 2010-06-18, 15:12: XS-Python-Version: >= 2.x XS-Python3-Version: >= 3.x This avoids any risk of existing packages inadvertently expressing support for a Python3 version, but adds more fields to debian/control (this would also imply, I think, XB-Python3-Version). This ends u

Re: Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-18 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 18, 2010, at 03:45 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: >[Luca Falavigna, 2010-06-18] >> Il 18/06/2010 14.37, Scott Kitterman ha scritto: >> > XS-Python-Version: >= 2.x >> > XS-Python3-Version: >= 3.x > >+1 (but with XB-Python-Version, i.e. no XB-Python3-Version) Agreed. This aligns with the decisi

Re: Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-18 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Luca Falavigna, 2010-06-18] > Il 18/06/2010 14.37, Scott Kitterman ha scritto: > > XS-Python-Version: >= 2.x > > XS-Python3-Version: >= 3.x +1 (but with XB-Python-Version, i.e. no XB-Python3-Version) -- Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.ozarowski.pl

Re: Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-18 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il 18/06/2010 14.37, Scott Kitterman ha scritto: > XS-Python-Version: >= 2.x > XS-Python3-Version: >= 3.x > > This avoids any risk of existing packages inadvertently expressing support > for > a Python3 version, but adds more fields to debian/control (this would also > imply, I think, XB-Python

Policy for "Specifying Supported Versions" for Python3

2010-06-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
The version of Python Policy that was just uploaded to unstable is the first one that attempts to address Python3. It is just a start and more changes are needed. POX and I were just discussion this and discovered that we had been carrying different assumptions about how packages would be expr