"Luca Falavigna" <dktrkr...@debian.org> wrote:
>Il 18/06/2010 14.37, Scott Kitterman ha scritto: >> XS-Python-Version: >= 2.x >> XS-Python3-Version: >= 3.x >> >> This avoids any risk of existing packages inadvertently expressing support >> for >> a Python3 version, but adds more fields to debian/control (this would also >> imply, I think, XB-Python3-Version). This ends up making Packages.gz (and >> .bz2) larger and making updates slower for everyone. > >I'd prefer this method over the above, it's clear and there's less risk >to inadvertitely support python3 without proper source changes. Size is >not that important: adding 30 bytes to 3,000 packages is less than 100Kb >unzipped in total size, not a big deal after all. > I take the view that it's already too big, so we should really strive to avoid making it any larger when there are reasonable alternatives. So I would argue there's no such thing as an increase that's not a big deal. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/668a4549-51b5-4d2f-9611-29e1ee2e4...@email.android.com
