* Cyril Brulebois , 2010-02-17, 14:58:
Jakub Wilk (17/02/2010):
* Failures, which should be fixable by give-backs:
jppyamd64 armel i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc
twisted-runner alpha amd64 armel i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel
powerpc
I think I've g
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 04:18:28PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 15:49, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:05:56AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> >> If there is a valid, technical reason, please let us know, but as of
> >> now I can't see any.
> >
> > Load
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 15:49, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:05:56AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> If there is a valid, technical reason, please let us know, but as of
>> now I can't see any.
>
> Loads of RC bugfixes (partly on obsolete versions) waiting to enter testing
> whic
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:05:56AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> If there is a valid, technical reason, please let us know, but as of
> now I can't see any.
Loads of RC bugfixes (partly on obsolete versions) waiting to enter testing
which would more blocked that it already is with the mips* bui
Jakub Wilk (17/02/2010):
> * Failures, which should be fixable by give-backs:
>
> jppy amd64 armel i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc
> twisted-runneralpha amd64 armel i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
> mips mipsel powerpc
I think I've given twisted-runner back sever
* Sandro Tosi , 2010-02-17, 07:28:
Switching to 2.6 would mean that the packages currently FTBFSing can't
be used (with the default interpreter).
So, sorry, but yes, I think the FTBFSes are holding up the transition,
and for a good reason. Hopefully, I guess a few NMUs should do the
trick.
Ok,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:31, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Hi
>
> Dne Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:28:58 +0100
> Sandro Tosi napsal(a):
>
>> Ok, but those ~10 packages are only the tip of the iceberg. They were
>> scheduled weeks ago, and if they're still there, they'll probably last
>> longer. For example, are
Hi
Dne Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:28:58 +0100
Sandro Tosi napsal(a):
> Ok, but those ~10 packages are only the tip of the iceberg. They were
> scheduled weeks ago, and if they're still there, they'll probably last
> longer. For example, are all the maintainers aware their packages are
> FTBFS? I took '
* Sandro Tosi , 2010-02-17, 07:28:
For example, are all the maintainers aware their packages are FTBFS? I
took 'gammu' as example, and there is no RC bug filed, so probably
Michael didn't even know gammu needs work.
FWIW, there is: http://bugs.debian.org/567231
--
Jakub Wilk
signature.asc
D
9 matches
Mail list logo
