On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:31, Michal Čihař <ni...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi > > Dne Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:28:58 +0100 > Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> napsal(a): > >> Ok, but those ~10 packages are only the tip of the iceberg. They were >> scheduled weeks ago, and if they're still there, they'll probably last >> longer. For example, are all the maintainers aware their packages are >> FTBFS? I took 'gammu' as example, and there is no RC bug filed, so >> probably Michael didn't even know gammu needs work. > > There is, but fixed in experimental. I just did not manage to extract > fixes to fix build of version in unstable (well the thing is that the > FTBFS is completely unrelated to Python version, it's just bad timing > in some test cases), so I will probably upload version from experimental > to unstable.
Thanks for complete the missing info! Please note, however, that I was only running an example, extracting info at 7AM, and I was not meaning any personal offense of no-action upon RC bugs, not bugs filing or so. Also, it was not the important part of the email: I've received 2 replies for this point and none on the other, probably no-one else cares about it. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8b2d7b4d1002170330i2d67a656rdf575352757cb...@mail.gmail.com
