On Sat May 6 2006 05:11, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 06 May 2006, Bruce Sass wrote:
> > I am wondering what defines the "default python", is it the one any
>
> /usr/bin/python provided by the "python" package. Right now it's 2.3.5.
So it is arbitrary, as in there is no technical reason whic
Le samedi 06 mai 2006 à 04:29 -0600, Bruce Sass a écrit :
> Is it unreasonable to want to install a module package which should work
> with any Python and have *.pyc's automatically compiled for an
> interpreter which lives in /usr/local/bin, or install a local
> interpreter and have Debian atte
On Sat, 06 May 2006, Bruce Sass wrote:
> I am wondering what defines the "default python", is it the one any
/usr/bin/python provided by the "python" package. Right now it's 2.3.5.
Supporting other versions apart from this one is only a convenience issue
for our users. Right now we have many pyt
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:57:17PM +0200, Marc Dequènes wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Any summaries, partial specs, top level descriptions, particularly good
> >> explanations of the stumbling blocks, etc., available for reading?
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PythonRoad
Hi,
I am wondering what defines the "default python", is it the one any
Python using Debian-native package must depend on, the one used by
python-support[1], the one all python dependent packages are urged to
work with, one meeting some other criteria, an arbitrary choice?
As I try to catch up
5 matches
Mail list logo
