On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:57:17PM +0200, Marc Dequènes wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Any summaries, partial specs, top level descriptions, particularly good > >> explanations of the stumbling blocks, etc., available for reading? > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PythonRoadmap > Is this Ubuntu roadmap of any concern for Debian ? Is doko not able to > make proposal and discuss it with the Debian Python Maintainers ? Seems > another evidence a team work with this guy is impossible. > > http://wiki.debian.org/IRC/debian-tech/Logs/20051120-python-policy > As i see, you've got many questions for which many people on this list > surely know the unswer for years. Why then do you discuss the policy > with people not involved in the Python packaging ? is that to be > discussed in an office far from reality ? Wow, what a constructive response. You've surely been on this list for years and must know all the changes that need to be made to Debian's python policy. Why didn't you reply to Bruce's original question with your own superior write-up of this policy? Seems evidence that teamwork with you is impossible. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
