On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 04:11, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 30 juin 2005 à 18:20 -0700, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
> > I suggest (a bit out of the blue, in no way yet endorsed by anyone) have
> > two source packages;
> >
> > pythonX.Y-foo (where X.Y is really "X.Y", not "2.3") that generates the
Many people either dont have time for, or dont want a relationship. Thats where
we come in. Take a look at our database of members to find just the type of lay
that you want. Listings are worldwide. Get some tonight.
http://saohe.hellimnone.com/wmld/fbs/
Special Announcement:
Good Day, I have been instructed by my head office to alert you to the fact
that your file has been reviewed and there now are a few potential options for
you to consider.
Please note that this issue is time sensitive and that your previous credit
situation is not an iss
Le jeudi 30 juin 2005 à 18:20 -0700, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
> I suggest (a bit out of the blue, in no way yet endorsed by anyone) have
> two source packages;
>
> pythonX.Y-foo (where X.Y is really "X.Y", not "2.3") that generates the
> multiple binary packages python2.2-foo, python2.3-foo, pytho
Le jeudi 30 juin 2005 à 16:49 -0700, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
> > Please, don't use the python2.X-foo scheme for such a small package. You
> > only need a single python-foo package, built against the default python
> > version. It eases transitions a lot, and avoids unnecessary cluttering
> > the a
5 matches
Mail list logo
