Re: Python packages in incoming

On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:39:06PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Anthony Towns writes: > > ] python-2.1_2.1.1 > > ] python_2.1.1 (depends on python-2.1) (does "ln /usr/bin/python{2.1,}") > > ] python-2.1-_ (depends on python-2.1) > > ] python-_ (depends on python and python-2.1-) > > Hrm. That

Re: Python upgrade path (draft/proposal)

On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 11:06:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > 4) Packages not compatible with python2 need to be uploaded >to use the python1.5 packages/binary. NMU's should be allowed >to fix these ... Possibly, you should reupload them renamed to be "python1.5-foo", as well, so that

Re: Python upgrade path (draft/proposal)

On Oct 17, Matthias Klose wrote: > With the last python-1.5.2-18.2 NMU we have non-conflicting python1.5, > 2.0 and 2.1 packages in unstable, not more not less. > > Here two proposals, how to go further on. The first proposal is a > safer proposal (but needs more uploads and needs loong). The seco

Python upgrade path (draft/proposal)

With the last python-1.5.2-18.2 NMU we have non-conflicting python1.5, 2.0 and 2.1 packages in unstable, not more not less. Here two proposals, how to go further on. The first proposal is a safer proposal (but needs more uploads and needs loong). The second proposal accepts some breakage during th

Re: libwxgtk2.2-python (fwd)

At some point, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd prefer the latest python and wxpython (and wxwindows-c++), > > I prefer the latest of everything too :) but this: > > > assuming there aren't any critical bugs. > > is one of the questions I want an anwser to here. > > Personally I've neve

Re: libwxgtk2.2-python (fwd)

> I'd prefer the latest python and wxpython (and wxwindows-c++), I prefer the latest of everything too :) but this: > assuming there aren't any critical bugs. is one of the questions I want an anwser to here. Personally I've never even installed python2.1 so I have no idea about it's stability

Re: Where has the docs in python-doc gone?

On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 10:43:21AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > It seems that you've never followed the list. > > $ dpkg -L python1.5-doc > > /. > /usr > /usr/share > /usr/share/doc > /usr/share/doc/python1.5 > /usr/share/doc/python1.5/html > /usr/share/doc/python1.5/html/index.html > /usr/share

Re: Where has the docs in python-doc gone?

Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/doc/python-doc$ dpkg -L python-doc > /. > /usr > /usr/share > /usr/share/doc > /usr/share/doc/python-doc > /usr/share/doc/python-doc/copyright > /usr/share/doc/python-doc/changelog.Debian.gz It seems that you've never followed

Where has the docs in python-doc gone?

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/doc/python-doc$ dpkg -L python-doc /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/python-doc /usr/share/doc/python-doc/copyright /usr/share/doc/python-doc/changelog.Debian.gz -- Danie Roux *shuffle* Adore Unix

Re: What should we do now?

Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [Currently I am unable to read new incoming mails ... I'll respond > later to other messages] > > Just uploaded a new python1.5 NMU which fixes three bugs I introduced. Fine. I would have loved to see sys.path reordered the way I proposed in the list

Re: Second report: latest python in unstable broke my packages

Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I didn't think the new packages were using alternatives? This is the first thing I checked: chinon:~$ ls -al /usr/bin/python lrwxr-xr-x1 root root 24 oct 16 12:14 /usr/bin/python -> /etc/alternatives/python > > > > I discovered