Re: Bug#41113: Proposal: Naming Conventions for modules

1999-07-17 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Saturday 17 July 1999, at 11 h 55, Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No; but, with < 5 people developing Python modules I suspect it's not > much of a problem. I don't think we are much more for Java: Debian has very few Java modules, except the Java virtual machines and the comp

Re: Bug#41113: Proposal: Naming Conventions for modules

1999-07-17 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Jul 17, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Friday 16 July 1999, at 13 h 21, the keyboard of Joey Hess > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And get a list of perl modules [1]. But I can't do that. I can with python > > modules though, which is very nice. > > Is there a formal policy for Python? I sear

Re: Bug#41113: Proposal: Naming Conventions for modules

1999-07-17 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Friday 16 July 1999, at 13 h 21, the keyboard of Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And get a list of perl modules [1]. But I can't do that. I can with python > modules though, which is very nice. Is there a formal policy for Python? I searched it and found nothing. As far as I know, th