arding mirrorbrain, I can go into further details as to why it
doesn't fit our use case but I think it's orthogonal to the discussion
here.
It's a great project, Peter Pöml has done a great work, and httpredir
is inspired on it.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
Hi,
On 12 April 2016 at 15:25, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
>> - the main code contributors (Simon and yours truly) have been
>> EBUSY/ENOTIME for a while - Simon, please correct me if I'm wrong
> [*]
>
>> What I
ge (wiki.d.o/education//) and then post it on a blog that is syndicated by planet (a
personal blog should be enough, a persistent copy would be at the wiki
anyway.)
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-projec
"blog.debian.org", if that ever get's started.
I think that having such a central point which has further restrictions
("hassle") is only going to prevent people from joining the effort.
Mentioning such blog posts on DWN would be great, of course.
Cheers,
--
Rap
[Hoping you don't mind a copy]
Hi Faidon,
On Thursday 21 June 2012 18:19:16 Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> On 06/21/12 23:32, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > After several iterations to solve problems related to Debian's mirrors
> > network, I am happy to announce a fully-functi
ussed and their respectiv policy drafted, then I would be happy to join
the discussion. I'm all open for it.
If, however, the whole thing is nevertheless seen as only one topic, then I
must say I profoundly object to the proposal.
Regards,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debi
;incubating"/whatever banner
but do promote them.
The worst thing we can do as a project is calling names or putting stickers
that say "it's John Doe's foo."
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-pr
rue or not) does that make any difference to Thijs'
argument?
This message is not meant to feed anything.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&
could include the
previous one, so that only one tarball exists in master.d.o. Access to old
tarballs would then require those who have parts of the keys to the new ones
and those with parts of the keys of the old ones - or cracking the
encryption, whatever happens first.
Comments?
From
Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> So, to get mail from 2 years ago, you have to decompress every tarball
> between now and then?
s/decompress/decrypt/ yes, that's the idea. Possibly having the secrets
shared between different people every time.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debia
hen it is their problem. They would be fighting against their own
desire.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
-private. A quick search with some keywords
indicate that there are about 15 threads that should remain private
every year, without counting VAC messages.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.d
Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 07:35:26PM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> If people start asking for the non-disclosure of their messages in
>> other languages or any other way that prevents an automated process
>> then it is their problem. They would be f
be declassified". The proposal is only about the first
kind and makes no distinction between the two others.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
to address that, it's not all
about the network.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Raphael Geissert said:
>> They do require a bit more work as they can not be added to the mirrors
>> master list - they are "dumb" caching proxies that can not guarantee the
>> consistency of the view of the archi
Hello Thomas
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>
> Maybe we could start with debian-project at the present and go back in
> time from there until we get bored, but I'm open to suggestions.
I administer some servers with customers and these are some of the facts
I've found:
* Many spam emails do not comply
Saludos,
Antonio Vitrián wrote:
> Bueno, hace algún tiempo que utilizo debian, mi cuestión es simple ¿puedo
> vender un equipo con debian instalado?
Sí
> y no me refiero a vender debian
> sino a vender el hardware ¿puedo poner un logotipo de debian en mi
> tienda? ¿en mi web?...
Sí, sie
bug soon; as it would otherwise be useless the fact that I am a DM
(at least for that specific package as it is *not* going to drop the -via
transitional package before squeeze is released with it).
[1]http://ftp-master.debian.org/dm-uploaders.html
[2]http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_003
Kin
ng Debian Maintainers and NMs
> --
> No changes will be done to existing Debian Maintainers, and the
> 6 months waiting time will not be applied to NMs who have already
> applied to become DD, unless they ask to be handled using the new
re maintaining a centralized list for DM upload rights, please
> implement it as a list of (DM, Package), not just as a list of
> (Package). Or even better, a list of (DM, Package, DD who endorsed this
> DM for this Package).
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
getting every maintainer's key in a keyring and LDAP? it would
finally allow for a better management system to take place
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Luk Claes wrote:
> Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>
>> What about getting every maintainer's key in a keyring and LDAP? it would
>> finally allow for a better management system to take place
>
> The problem is that not all maintainers have keys in the first place.
W
[No mail copies, please]
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 23/10/08 at 12:05 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>
>> > On 22/10/08 at 23:33 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> >
>> >> and keyring managers
>> >> would like
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> On 11547 March 1977, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>> Debian Maintainer
>>> -
>>> They are allowed to upload their own (source) package. The allowed list
>>> of (source) packages to upload can be edited by any member o
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
>> > Having NMs in a keyring, maintained by keyring-maint, would probably
>> > solve this, and we could provide access to our porter machines when
>> > there is the need.
>>
>> W
2008/10/23 Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 14:41:13 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
>> Peter Palfrader wrote:
>>
>> > Also I question what good it would actually do.
>>
>> If you only keep human maintainers in LDAP (or t
2008/10/23 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>>> On 11547 March 1977, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>>>> Debian Maintainer
>>>>> -
>>>>> They are allowed to upload their
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 01:43:31PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> > Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
>> >> What about getting every maintainer's key in a keyring and LDAP? it would
>> >> final
Hi Luk,
2008/10/23 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>
>> Right, but do the members of the NMC cover the wide variety of
>> programming languages?
>> or what kind of review are they going to do? just packaging stuff? if
>> it is just
se.
`
Goal: accomplish the promise, as it has not yet been fully accomplished.
Cheers,
- --
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAklMXpoACgkQYy49rUbZzloOoACgmxl5ryslRhD2fBPMBisEhA5j
Nh
r week. I guess we could clearly see
how -release gets spammed during the freeze and other similar and interesting
bits.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
s quite a bit
off them so that it can finish an archive wide (sid/main/i386 only atm) run
in less than a week.
I'm not the right person to talk about lintian.d.o, though; putting
lint-maint in the loop.
P.S. no need to CC-me as long as either lintian-maint or -project receive a
copy.
Cheers,
--
sible to send their mail
> from debian.org machines or from a short whitelist of machines elsewhere.
@packages.d.o is known to be "the easiest way to get in touch with a
maintainer," and is often used when CC'ing maintainers of multiple packages.
Cheers,
--
Raphael G
December, which means there are 30 days to decide many
things, if necessary.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
serv is just one of the ways to
fix the problem of having to guess a correct start number, among many
others; and any system that doesn't implement that is actually a
regression. There are other tools similar to insserv that also do
dependency-based booting (but AFAIK none of them are in Debian
eriments) it
is as easy as modifying the init script.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Montag, 24. August 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> The difference is that now many tests can be performed and the
>> bugs fixed;
>
> If this is true, and I believe it is, I will buy you a $beer next time we
> meet - and remember :
Hi Holger,
Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Montag, 31. August 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
>> By the way, piuparts may help breaking some init scripts, see:
>> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/init.d-script-sourcing-without-test.html
>> :)
>
> I dont understand, can y
from it would need to be very cooperative in
multiple ways with the representative too.
P.S. please don't send me a copy of your messages. I read the three CC'ed
lists. And sorry for the cross-post.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
thing that was working: Windows.
And for those suggesting one should modify the installation media: good luck
saying that to newcomers.
It's difficult enough for some people to find the right iso they need.
Regards,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get
41 matches
Mail list logo
