On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:19:12AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> AFAIK Matthew Garrett hasn't been "active and directly involved
> participant in the Debian development community" for years. What is
> the reason for keeping his blog on planet.d.o?
Matthew has been blogging frequently over the several
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:45:59AM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:19:12AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > AFAIK Matthew Garrett hasn't been "active and directly involved
> > participant in the Debian development community" for years. What is
> > the reason for keeping his bl
[Lars Wirzenius, 2012-10-30]
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:19:12AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > AFAIK Matthew Garrett hasn't been "active and directly involved
> > participant in the Debian development community" for years. What is
> > the reason for keeping his blog on planet.d.o?
>
> Matthew has
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> On a more general note: I find it a bit rude to feed planet FOO with
> content not related to FOO. It's not that bad on planet.debian.org
> compared to other planets, but it could be better. I'd volunteer to go
> through all feed URLs and a
[Paul Wise, 2012-10-30]
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>
> > On a more general note: I find it a bit rude to feed planet FOO with
> > content not related to FOO. It's not that bad on planet.debian.org
> > compared to other planets, but it could be better. I'd volunteer t
On 10/30/2012 08:05 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Paul Wise, 2012-10-30]
>> http://wiki.debian.org/PlanetDebian#What_Can_I_Post_On_Planet
>
> and this part is written in stone and we cannot change it?
I doubt if you would find many supporters to change it.
> Anyway, I don't care that much, as sa
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:05:11PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Paul Wise, 2012-10-30]
> > Content unrelated to Debian is specifically acceptable on Planet Debian:
> >
> > http://wiki.debian.org/PlanetDebian#What_Can_I_Post_On_Planet
>
> and this part is written in stone and we cannot change
Lars Wirzenius
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 12:19:12AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > AFAIK Matthew Garrett hasn't been "active and directly involved
> > participant in the Debian development community" for years. What is
> > the reason for keeping his blog on planet.d.o?
[...]
> Now, when he blogs abo
* Lars Wirzenius , 2012-10-30, 09:45:
AFAIK Matthew Garrett hasn't been "active and directly involved
participant in the Debian development community" for years. What is
the reason for keeping his blog on planet.d.o?
Matthew has been blogging frequently over the several past years, and
aggregat
On Tue, October 30, 2012 12:38, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Lars Wirzenius , 2012-10-30, 09:45:
>>>AFAIK Matthew Garrett hasn't been "active and directly involved
>>>participant in the Debian development community" for years. What is
>>>the reason for keeping his blog on planet.d.o?
>>Matthew has been bl
Jakub Wilk writes ("mjg59's blog on planet.d.o"):
> AFAIK Matthew Garrett hasn't been "active and directly involved
> participant in the Debian development community" for years. What is the
> reason for keeping his blog on planet.d.o?
I have just gone to read the background to this. You are app
On 2012-10-30 10:44, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
I'd volunteer to go
through all feed URLs and add missing tags/categories but I'm afraid
the
"I like to read about personal life of people related to FOO" lobby
is
too loud.
This actually seems backwards to me. Blog posts are not a good way to
di
Hi Sirs/Madams,
This is Mickey from H&C Printing Centre. I got your information from your
website, knowing that you might be in need of related printing service.
We are professional company in printing for several years and enjoy a good
reputation from our clients in European, North America
Moray Allan writes:
> So I would suggest instead that material "unrelated to Debian", but from
> people within the broad community, is actually by far the best use for
> Planet Debian, and that the more relevant posts are to Debian, the less
> appropriate they are for Planet.
Would people like m
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 01:38:03PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Moray Allan writes:
>
> > So I would suggest instead that material "unrelated to Debian", but from
> > people within the broad community, is actually by far the best use for
> > Planet Debian, and that the more relevant posts are to
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 01:38:03PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Would people like me to push my entire blog to Planet Debian, including
> all my book reviews and software release announcements?
As one who evenly enjoys the technical package type blog entries along
with lets call it "other stuff Deb
On 13015 March 1977, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> So I would suggest instead that material "unrelated to Debian", but from
>> people within the broad community, is actually by far the best use for
>> Planet Debian, and that the more relevant posts are to Debian, the less
>> appropriate they are for Plan
On 13015 March 1977, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> AFAIK Matthew Garrett hasn't been "active and directly involved
> participant in the Debian development community" for years. What is the
> reason for keeping his blog on planet.d.o?
Lots of interesting articles, which (more or less directly) touch
Debian.
On 2012-10-30 20:38, Russ Allbery wrote:
Would people like me to push my entire blog to Planet Debian,
including
all my book reviews and software release announcements?
I would prefer that over only pushing articles specifically on Debian
topics, yes.
For the specific categories you mention
Moray Allan writes:
> For the specific categories you mention, I realise there are potential
> issues: dry factual release announcements for lots of minor versions of
> software someone doesn't use might be boring to see, and long reviews
> might be a UI annoyance for people reading Planet in a f
On 13016 March 1977, Russ Allbery wrote:
> My reviews are pretty long -- I could probably modify the hand-rolled
> software that generates the RSS feed to simulate a cut tag or
> something.
Oh yuck, please don't. Such things are something like the worlds second
most stupid thing ever invented. :)
21 matches
Mail list logo