On 13015 March 1977, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> So I would suggest instead that material "unrelated to Debian", but from
>> people within the broad community, is actually by far the best use for
>> Planet Debian, and that the more relevant posts are to Debian, the less
>> appropriate they are for Planet.
> Would people like me to push my entire blog to Planet Debian, including
> all my book reviews and software release announcements?
> Serious question. I currently maintain a separate "debian" tag that only
> gets posts that feel relevant to Debian because I was worried about
> dumping too much content into Planet Debian, but I can undo that and give
> Planet Debian a full feed if people would really prefer.
In the (very) past there was someone posting a ton of "little" things of
various, entirely Debian unrelated, "entries". More like, "twitter" or
"facebook" style, than blogging, ie not even full written. Such a thing
isn't wanted, thats plain flooding. But full postings with basically any
(commonly accepted[1]) non-spam content, including non-Debian one, is fine.
Planet is a means to get to know more about people without attaching a
rfid chip and a surveillance camera to each DD. And if I want to know
what such a DD does in Debian - I have dozens of other services for that
already, so yeah, add more personal things to planet... :)
[1] sod it, im not running into that minefield of defining commonly
accepted here. :)
--
bye, Joerg
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/How_to_win_an_argument
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ip9r7c1p....@gkar.ganneff.de
