Luca BRUNO writes:
> Stefano Zacchiroli scrisse:
>
>> > > \item You cannot use DEBIAN trademarks in a domain name, with or
>> > > without commercial intent.
>> > So debian.mirror.my.org is illegal?
>>
>> I've been correct by Mako on this before. Short answer: hostname !=
>> domain name, so "debi
Le Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:38:09AM +0100, Philip Hands a écrit :
>
> The trouble with trying to nail that definition down is that there are
> people who are foolish enough to buy domains of the form:
>
> debian.uk.com
In that case, I think that the problem is rather that the
uk-dot-com-regist
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Actually, I've realize only later an important overlook in my first
> follow-up to this. This provision is positive, in the "you can use our
> trademarks to ..." form. As such, it is just a public declaration that
> we are with that kind of use. It does *not* follow from
Dear FTP team and everybody,
I often find works licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution license 2.0,
which Debian does not consider Free. In contrast, the version 3.0 is accepted
as Free by Debian.
Can you tell me what are the modifications in the text between version 2.0 and
3.0 that ch
Le Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:07:21PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit :
>
> I guess the glory details could be found at
> http://evan.prodromou.name/ccsummary/ccsummary.html
> and
> http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3#Debian
Hi,
these are the URLs that I am usually pointed to, and they expl
5 matches
Mail list logo
