Le Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:07:21PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit : > > I guess the glory details could be found at > http://evan.prodromou.name/ccsummary/ccsummary.html > and > http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3#Debian
Hi, these are the URLs that I am usually pointed to, and they explain what, in the point of view that emerged on the debian-legal mailing list, is problematic with the version 2.0. However, it does not indicate which of the objecctions raised were considered valid by the FTP team (there are sometimes differences of point of view between the expressed opinions on debian-legal and the FTP team decisions), nor it indicates what was changed in 3.0, which adressed Debian's concerns. What is precisely the problem, and how it was solved, is imporant information that I think would be very valuable when suggesting Upstream to replace the Creative Commons Attribution License 2.0 by version 3.0. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120803015647.gb4...@falafel.plessy.net
