Hi,
Welcome to the debian community.
For your questions, my idea is, if you have a good internet
connectivity, it's best if you can do a minimal installation using CD1
and use the package manager to install other packages as your
preference.
Cheers!
~Chamith
-
*** There's no place like ${HO
On Sat, 31 May 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > People submitting known bad keys to ldap and stuffing those in their
> > authorized_keys files also. What else did you think it meant?
>
> I have no idea, because I don't understand why the above would warrant a
> policy change wrt authorized_keys.
On Sun, 01 Jun 2008, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > know it. I suppose etc/motd will eventually be updated to point to it
> > also.
>
> What's the use if you can't manage to login?
Is this just to show that you have no idea what this is about,
On Sat, 31 May 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I.e., it's "for developers", which is not the same thing as "about
> development".
Funnily it got posted in a mail that is named "Misc _development_ news".
:-)
> It's a policy change which should be communicated to the developer body.
[...]
> Does this
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 00:42:57 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 07:18:14PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Because bugs may also have been (or seem to have been overlooked). The
> > risk here is that the person doing the NMU thinks "oh, that's an old
> > issue and the fix
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> (hint: how would you place that file there in the first place?)
Ask for a password change. Send your key with ssh-copy-id. Don't change
your password and lose it. And then try to login with your SSH key.
OK, one has to be a bit thick to do that.
--
Bonjour MR/Mme
Je suis Mr ROUGET GEROME propriétaire et gérant d'un parc AUTO
(D'AUTOMOBILE) spécialisée dans la vente et la location des
vehicules et résidant dans toute L'AFRIQUE DE L’OUEST.
J’ai eu à lire votre annonce de vente de voiture sur Internet et je tiens
à vous faire part de mon d
On Sun, 01 Jun 2008, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > (hint: how would you place that file there in the first place?)
>
> Ask for a password change. Send your key with ssh-copy-id. Don't change
> your password and lose it. And then try to login wit
On Sun, 01 Jun 2008, Philip Hands wrote:
> If there's some reason that you want specific keys to only give access
> to specific hosts, and if the reason justifies the effort, I suppose it
> would be possible to come up with a way of tagging which hosts any
> particular key should give access to in
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 00:42:57 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 07:18:14PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>>> Because bugs may also have been (or seem to have been overlooked). The
>>> risk here is that the person doing the NMU thinks "oh, that's an
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 09:15:19AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Sat, 31 May 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > People submitting known bad keys to ldap and stuffing those in their
> > > authorized_keys files also. What else did you think it meant?
> >
> > I have no idea, because I don't u
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:41:54PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> [1] With one exception: mails with large attachments may be accepted by
> the BTS, but not reach the maintainer. For example, lists.d.o has a size
> limit, while bugs.d.o does not (#475682).
You have to make a point somewhere. Everythi
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 12:22:14AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> 5.11.1 When and how to do an NMU
>
> I propose to add "NMUs are usually not appropriate for team-maintained
> packages. Consider sending a patch to the BTS instead." to the bullet
> list.
And we are they not able to respond to the
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 01:29:23PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > ... and IME they usually *are* for active teams, so I'm not sure I can
> > buy your argument. I rather conclude that active teams won't risk
> > anything with the procedure which is being proposed, while not active
> > teams will s
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 11:10:42AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> While this is initially for our (DSA's) benefit, in that it makes applying
> global changes easier, it's also for user's benefit.
Er, "we're taking away your options for your own good"? :)
> -- compare the effort required to ensure t
* Stefano Zacchiroli
| Not that I am against requiring the specific NMU mention in the mail
| (especially considering how cheap it as a requirement), but isn't the
| package maintainer going to receive some upload notification for the
| entrance in DELAYED?
No, they are not.
| Out of memory ind
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 09:15:19AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Sat, 31 May 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > People submitting known bad keys to ldap and stuffing those in their
> > > authorized_keys files also. What else did you think it meant?
> > I have no idea, because I don't underst
On 01/06/08 at 15:29 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 00:42:57 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 07:18:14PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >>> Because bugs may also have been (or seem to have been overlooked). The
> >>> risk he
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 09:47:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Ideally, I would hope that at some future date the openssh packages gain
> support for disabling DSS user keys via the config and the debian.org
> machines could use that, bringing the behavior back closer into line with
> the stock
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 07:01:44PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | Out of memory indeed it is not, but probably it should (of course
> | only the first time the package enters DELAYED, not each passing day
> | ...).
> This requires a fair bit more state than the queue currently has. I'm
> not su
On 11403 March 1977, Steve Langasek wrote:
> So tagging a key as belonging to a particular host is insufficient - we need
> the full authorized_keys semantics for setting key options (from=, command=,
> no-port-forwarding, no-X11-forwarding, at least).
And? You have that already, just add that in
Le Sat, May 31, 2008 at 06:08:56PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> On 01/06/08 at 00:22 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> > 5.11.1 When and how to do an NMU
> >
> > I propose to add "NMUs are usually not appropriate for team-maintained
> > packages. Consider sending a patch to the BTS instead.
Le Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:41:54PM +0200, Frans Pop a écrit :
> On Saturday 31 May 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > * Have you clearly expressed your intention to NMU, at least on the
> > BTS? Has the maintainer been notified of it? It is also a good
> > idea to try to contact the ma
23 matches
Mail list logo
