On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 07:01:44PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > | Out of memory indeed it is not, but probably it should (of course > | only the first time the package enters DELAYED, not each passing day > | ...). > This requires a fair bit more state than the queue currently has. I'm > not sure I want to do this, at least not without a good and convincing > argument for why it's useful.
I think this whole thread should be convincing :) No matter, what will be the procedure we will agree upon, if someone is trying to NMU a package of mine using DELAYED, I want to be notified ASAP even if the NMUer (rightful or not) forgot to inform me. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 [EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ I'm still an SGML person,this newfangled /\ All one has to do is hit the XML stuff is so ... simplistic -- Manoj \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
