Anthony Towns wrote:
> [...] the torch
> is just taken up by Thomas and Joel and MJ Ray anyway and the
> accusations of working against the project continue without abate.
As far as I can tell, I made no accusations and I dislike you
linking my name with them, especially given the nature of your
c
ti, 2005-04-12 kello 00:20 +0200, Luk Claes kirjoitti:
> This is a proposal for Debian's consultants page. There are some
> differences with the previous proposal: point 3 is new and the last
> paragraph has changed.
Looks good to me, with the minor tweak in wording I suggest below.
> 2. Furthe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/01/2005
11:46:25 AM:
> MJ,
>
> I don't really know myself what the procedures are, but I'm CCing
the
> trademark list on this for their feedback.
>
> -- John
>
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 05:11:30PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > SPI board members,
> >
> > The debian pro
I don't understand it and I'm not happy about it but I accept it. A market
almost always makes better decisions than an individual. If the majority of
the Debian project doesn't carry a grudge about the SPI accounting mishap
then I guess I can't either.
I officially bury the hatchet, smoke'em p
Greg wrote:
> If you forward me the the information about
> the disputed domain and the relevant correspondence, I will take a look.
Thanks to Greg for the reply.
Will the outgoing DPL do this for the domains which triggered this
enquiry, please? It seems like it's a simple update to the summary
Andreas Schuldei,
I've heard both grumbles and praise from people who have worked
on things with you. On the whole, I liked the sound of most of
your ideas and think they could move debian on. I was slightly
disappointed with proportion of -vote emails answered and a weak
showing in the IRC debate
aj wrote:
> Henning Makholm wrote:
> >modified-noncommercial-redistribution
> nonprofit-mod-dist
>
> >unmodified-noncommercial-redistribution
> nonprofit-dist
Those two are not direct equivalents.
I also think use of any fsf- or osi- tags should be clearly
very tightly linked to their li
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 4:16 pm, MJ Ray wrote:
> I've heard both grumbles and praise from people who have worked
> on things with you. On the whole, I liked the sound of most of
> your ideas and think they could move debian on. I was slightly
> disappointed with proportion of -vote emails answered
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 18:46 -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 April 2005 4:16 pm, MJ Ray wrote:
> > I've heard both grumbles and praise from people who have worked
> > on things with you. On the whole, I liked the sound of most of
> > your ideas and think they could move debian on. I was
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 7:53 pm, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> As a last resort, you can probably copy-paste the ballot from somewhere
> like: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2005/04/msg00022.html
Can I really do that? I thought that the hex crypto salt thingy does something
magical for authenticity
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 19:17 -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 April 2005 7:53 pm, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> > As a last resort, you can probably copy-paste the ballot from somewhere
> > like: http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2005/04/msg00022.html
>
> Can I really do that? I thought that
11 matches
Mail list logo
