On Saturday, 25 March 2017 16:25:38 CEST Guillem Jover wrote:
> Personally I have no issue with coalescing
> copyright notices, as long as they are all for the same license, etc.
> I even coalesce copyright years for the same owner.
Coalescing copyright notices and years is also done when running
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 04:25:38PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
Thanks for your feedback! Been a while since we've chatted. :)
> On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 14:02:49 -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > In returning my attention to current Debian packaging practices and
> > conventions I took m
Guillem Jover writes:
> Something that is also a common source of confusion, is that because
> it specifies a Files field, it seems it compels people to do very
> fine-grained splitting. Personally I have no issue with coalescing
> copyright notices, as long as they are all for the same license,
Hi!
On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 14:02:49 -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> In returning my attention to current Debian packaging practices and
> conventions I took my first serious look at good old DEP5, and brought
> the debian/copyright file for my first-ever package, xtrs[1], into
> conformance wit
Hi folks,
Sorry to bother you again so soon.
In returning my attention to current Debian packaging practices and
conventions I took my first serious look at good old DEP5, and brought
the debian/copyright file for my first-ever package, xtrs[1], into
conformance with the new[2] standard[3].
Howe
5 matches
Mail list logo
