Hi,
On 20/05/14 at 14:26 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> is there anything more I can (or need to) do?
No, that's on my TO-DO list now.
Thanks,
Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
Dear all,
is there anything more I can (or need to) do?
Thanks,
RIchard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/CAD77+gT1ys4qxUj4dNf3ng=sohb267c5bf5muwa
Dear all,
just for the record, we incorporated ourselves on May 3rd as planned;
the official name is "DebConf Deutschland e.V.".
Work to be granted the status of non-profit is well under way.
All seven founding members (the legally required minimum) are DDs and
we all agree that we will keep the
Hi,
On 03/05/14 at 10:54 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > As you already described how you met the TO criteria in
> > ,
> > I think that we can safely say that the minimum two weeks discussion
> > period started on 2014-04-26 (and thus
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> The last step was never used so far AFAIK.
> But it could probably be implemented as a d-d-a email providing the updated
> list of TOs, and a page on the Debian website listing TOs and referencing
> the d-d-a email.
> (Similar to delegation
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> As you already described how you met the TO criteria in
> ,
> I think that we can safely say that the minimum two weeks discussion
> period started on 2014-04-26 (and thus ends on 2014-05-11).
Works for me. Just to make sure: This means tha
On 02/05/14 at 19:47 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> as announced some time ago, we will incorporate DebConfDeutschland
> e.V. tomorrow.
>
> All founding members will be DDs with the full list being sent as a
> reply to this email after the fact.
>
>
> Given that:
>
> * We will
Dear all,
as announced some time ago, we will incorporate DebConfDeutschland
e.V. tomorrow.
All founding members will be DDs with the full list being sent as a
reply to this email after the fact.
Given that:
* We will not be using the name "Debian"
* We are not planning to run for more than ne
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:56 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I personally think that this could be enough, but would welcome more
> opinions on that.
Same and same.
We would appreciate more feedback on this (and on when silence will be
interpreted as implicit consensus).
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> So I'm not against considering the idea of keep the DC15 TO after DC15,
> but this will clearly have to be weighted against the disadvantages of
> this option.
We decided to go with a single-use eV for DebConf15, because:
* of the valid
On 26/04/14 at 23:42 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> Before anyone raises this point: Yes, we tried contacting[1] FFIS, but
> they have not even answered in more than four weeks; we are not
> confident that they would be more reactive going forward and do not
> consider them an option any more.
>
Hi,
On 26/04/14 at 23:42 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> 2. The organization should remain loyal to Debian
>
> See 1.
> Going against Debian's best interest now or in the future would not
> only be stupid beyond description, it would also wipe out our
> collective reputations and remove the comm
also sprach Andreas Barth [2014-04-27 11:23 +0200]:
> According to regularation for tax advisors (Standesrecht) this
> won't be legal.
It won't be legal to represent us towards the tax authorities, but
there is nothing, IMHO, that speaks against free advice.
> However there are advisors who are
* martin f krafft (madd...@debconf.org) [140427 11:00]:
> also sprach Andreas Barth [2014-04-27 10:53 +0200]:
> > However, one need to check if all of Debconf falls into that, or if
> > parts don't. Tax authorities don't necessarily consider one event
> > "treated all as one", see e.g. page 39, nr
also sprach Andreas Barth [2014-04-27 10:53 +0200]:
> However, one need to check if all of Debconf falls into that, or if
> parts don't. Tax authorities don't necessarily consider one event
> "treated all as one", see e.g. page 39, nr 206 of
> http://www.bestellen.bayern.de/shoplink/06003006.htm
* martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [140427 08:31]:
> also sprach Andreas Barth [2014-04-27 01:09 +0200]:
> > If you get money where you provide some value for (and sponsorship
> > might fall into that category, if e.g. logos are shown somewhere),
> > then this money is VAT-taxable (unless one
also sprach Andreas Barth [2014-04-27 01:09 +0200]:
> (For this reason, after some more thinking I wouldn't recommend to
> name it "Debconf15 e.V", but rather "Debconf Deutschland e.V.".)
Yes, this was my intention: design it as a throw-away, but without
stating so. And of course this leaves open
* Andreas Barth (a...@ayous.org) [140427 01:10]:
> * Richard Hartmann (richih.mailingl...@gmail.com) [140427 00:40]:
> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Debconf has a different tax situation than a normal TO setup
> > > (especially given the amount of money might brin
* Richard Hartmann (richih.mailingl...@gmail.com) [140427 00:40]:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> > I'm running some throw-away non-profit organisations, and have not
> > experienced problems.
>
> Have the tax authorities been made aware of this in advance? For how
>
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I'm running some throw-away non-profit organisations, and have not
> experienced problems.
Have the tax authorities been made aware of this in advance? For how
long are those organisations running?
> Debconf has a different tax situation
* Richard Hartmann (richih.mailingl...@gmail.com) [140426 23:42]:
> * Debian Deutschland e.V.
> * DebConf Deutschland e.V.
> * DebConf15 Deutschland e.V.
>
> From our understanding, German tax authorities don't like
> throw-away/single-use non-profit organisations, but we have no proof
> of that,
Dear all,
the German local team for DebConf15 is in the process of incorporating itself.
We need a legal shell for signing contracts, taking in donations, and
for insurance reasons. Plus, we are expecting to gain non-profit
status which means tax exemption and thus more money for making
DebConf1
22 matches
Mail list logo
