Hi, On 03/05/14 at 10:54 +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote: > On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <lea...@debian.org> wrote: > > > As you already described how you met the TO criteria in > > <cad77+gqwz0opgzi2qsgre3y3vbungtg6b4beqtcqbrz-wjh...@mail.gmail.com>, > > I think that we can safely say that the minimum two weeks discussion > > period started on 2014-04-26 (and thus ends on 2014-05-11). > > Works for me. Just to make sure: This means that unless someone raises > objections, we can expect you to rubberstamp our status (and tell us > what, if anything, else we need to do at that time?)
Yes > From the docs, the last step is not entirely clear to me, but it > really seems to be as simple as you saying "they are TO, please add to > your list" and sending to auditor@ The last step was never used so far AFAIK. But it could probably be implemented as a d-d-a email providing the updated list of TOs, and a page on the Debian website listing TOs and referencing the d-d-a email. (Similar to delegations and https://www.debian.org/intro/organization) Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140503090343.ga29...@xanadu.blop.info
