Harald Geyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...]
> should reply to the arguments and ignore the insulting parts. Of course
> it is a good idea, to give feedback if a message was perceived as
> insultung, but this is probably better done in private.
I think that some feedback should be in public, in order t
ver again instead of using references; about not taking the time to
understand what somebody else actually wrote.
As it is always the case with culture, this can only change slowly and only
through good examples.
Finally, to make the good example I'm talking about, I refer to the
Debian C
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Why do people actually believe that telling everyone to ignore flames is a
> workable strategy? [...]
I don't. debian is not (should not be) a monoculture and
there's the danger of ignoring badly-worded non-flame/troll
posts, which is silly and intolerant. It's
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:34:56AM +0100, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:05:48AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
> > > And keeping those not
> > > bored with them making pseudo decisions (or DD's opinion) for the r
4 matches
Mail list logo
