also sprach Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.04.1820 +0100]:
> You can expect that our release updates will continue - at least if the
> current release team members will stay.
Great. From what I can tell, I speak for quite a few people when
I say that I am really please with the current
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050304 10:45]:
> also sprach Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.04.1016 +0100]:
> > > I think it would be helpful if (in future) the release team would
> > > communicate their list of release criteria well in advance of their
> > > estimated time of re
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 10:16 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I don't know what you'll consider as release criteria, but if you mean
> the list at http://release.debian.org/sarge_rc_policy.txt - that's
> unchanged for quite a long while now.
That's partly it, but it'd also include stuff like (for Sar
also sprach Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.04.1016 +0100]:
> > I think it would be helpful if (in future) the release team would
> > communicate their list of release criteria well in advance of their
> > estimated time of release.
>
> I don't know what you'll consider as release crite
* Matthew Garrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050304 09:40]:
> Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * I had recently post a message to debian-project[1] suggesting that we
> > could plan structural changes in Debian, I mean, We all know that
> > "Debian releases when it's ready", but few people kn
Hm. I meant to send this to -vote - sorry about that.
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> * I had recently post a message to debian-project[1] suggesting that we
>> could plan structural changes in Debian, I mean, We all know that
>> "Debian r
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 07:40:59PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> I think it would be helpful if (in future) the release team would
> communicate their list of release criteria well in advance of their
> estimated time of release.
One thing I'd like to suggest are bi-weekly (or monthly) public
I
Em Qui, 2005-03-03 às 16:40, Matthew Garrett escreveu:
> I think it would be helpful if (in future) the release team would
> communicate their list of release criteria well in advance of their
> estimated time of release.
Well, in a perfect world, we would have the release criteria for etch
before
Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * I had recently post a message to debian-project[1] suggesting that we
> could plan structural changes in Debian, I mean, We all know that
> "Debian releases when it's ready", but few people know what the "it"
> means. For example, if the init maintainers
9 matches
Mail list logo
