Hm. I meant to send this to -vote - sorry about that. Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> * I had recently post a message to debian-project[1] suggesting that we >> could plan structural changes in Debian, I mean, We all know that >> "Debian releases when it's ready", but few people know what the "it" >> means. For example, if the init maintainers decide to define the locale >> environment variables at the boot process, many packages would break >> and then Debian would be far from being ready. I'm not criticizing this >> structural changes, but I do think that the DPL could coordinate this >> sctructural changes in a way more people know what it means by "when >> it's ready". I would like the candidates to comment on this topic. > > I think it would be helpful if (in future) the release team would > communicate their list of release criteria well in advance of their > estimated time of release. Having some idea of what needs to be done > before a release will even be considered would make it easier to > maintain motivation - there's been various times during the past 18 > months or so where people have voiced incredulity at the idea of us > performing a release at any point in the near future, and that makes it > significantly harder to concentrate on working towards that release. > > -- > Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
