After a few hours it can be marked as fixed.
Since Debian 6 I use Brazilian mirrors, and nothing like this ever happened
before.
I would blame those cheap ISP's that were blocking since March 18th.
Thanks Debian project.
Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote on 04/04/2023 at 11:13:46+0200:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Good signature from EE215B9FB8C45B0B Pierre-Elliott Bécue
> (trust ultimate) created at 2023-04-04T11:22:55+0200 using
> RSA]]
> Adding DSA as this is a DNS matter which falls under our scope.
>
> "marito...@yahoo.c
Adding DSA as this is a DNS matter which falls under our scope.
"marito...@yahoo.com" wrote on 04/04/2023 at
05:36:35+0200:
> I will start comparing some domains:
>
> root@LEDE:~# nslookup debian.org 1.1.1.1
> Server: 1.1.1.1
> Address: 1.1.1.1#53
>
> Name: debian.org
> Addr
I will start comparing some domains:
root@LEDE:~# nslookup debian.org 1.1.1.1
Server: 1.1.1.1
Address: 1.1.1.1#53
Name: debian.org
Address 1: 130.89.148.77
Address 2: 128.31.0.62
Address 3: 149.20.4.15
Address 4: 2603:400a::bb8::801f:3e
Address 5: 2001:67c:2564:a119::77
Ad
Hi George,
You can reach the web team on their mailing list at
debian-...@lists.debian.org or on IRC on the #debian-www channel, on OFTC.
If you want to have a look at the current code for debian.org, it's
hosted here [1].
Cheers,
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶
On Sat, 2020-12-19 at 13:55 +, George Suba wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I did read somewhere on net about new site and since then (today) I
> visited the debian.org site. I think I can help with it or at least I
> could provide some valuable directions.
>
> ( I use bash, responsive frameworks lik
Dear all,
I did read somewhere on net about new site and since then (today) I
visited the debian.org site. I think I can help with it or at least I
could provide some valuable directions.
( I use bash, responsive frameworks like bootstrap, apache, pure html,
markdown and git )
- Can someon
Le 11/09/2017 à 13:01, Laura Arjona Reina a écrit :
> I would suggest to add a README txt file to the website repo, detailing
> how to curate/update the list. That README file may list the
> examples/details of the criteria that you already gave, or just link to
> this mail thread in the web archiv
Hello
El 06/09/17 a las 04:07, Paul Wise escribió:
> On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 10:52 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
>> Altough it's not necessarily trivial to evaluate your criteria:
>
> We didn't want to give specific examples for many of them, since
> different distros will have different ways of
On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 10:52 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Altough it's not necessarily trivial to evaluate your criteria:
We didn't want to give specific examples for many of them, since
different distros will have different ways of working.
> On Tue, 05 Sep 2017, Paul Wise wrote:
> > acti
Hi,
On Tue, 05 Sep 2017, Paul Wise wrote:
> I discussed this a bit more with Stéphane Blondon offlist and we came
> up with this proposal for the criteria and how to list derivatives.
>
> We would welcome some feedback on these new criteria.
I don't have anything to add. It looks good to me (and
Stéphane Blondon wrote:
> - should we add list some derivatives in /derivatives/ page?
> - if yes, which criteria should be used to limit the list?
I discussed this a bit more with Stéphane Blondon offlist and we came
up with this proposal for the criteria and how to list derivatives.
We woul
Le 28 Jun 2017, Paul Wise a écrit :
> I would prefer that any listed distros have taken the minimal step of
> developing a relationship with Debian of becoming represented in the
> derivatives census.
I think it's a good criteria but I'm afraid it will be probably fuzzy to
consider if the relatio
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
> - should we add list some derivatives in /derivatives/ page?
Yes, but only a limited selection.
> - if yes, which criteria should be used to limit the list?
Initially I thought only list particularly important distros. In
particular,
Hello,
Currently, there is misc/children-distros page [0] listing a lot of
derivatives. The content originates in 1998 (in another file: [1]),
then the children-distros page appeared in 2002 [2].
The page becames longer and longer until today, without a clear strategy
about what the page should co
My gut feeling is the Derivatives page should be the page that lists
distros derived from or "children" of Debian. Creating a new page is just
more effort when the hard word has been done already.
On 2 February 2017 at 19:21, Stéphane Blondon
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> we (debian-www) are work
Hello everyone,
we (debian-www) are working on a new page about Debian derivatives for
www.d.o.
Currently, the page https://www.debian.org/misc/children-distros.fr.html
provides a list of derivatives but it's not maintained. The wiki
provides a list too (https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Census
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 06:43:40PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> Start here http://www.debian.org/devel/website/
Thanks for having given this pointer to Scott.
> And first of all forget about creating flashy-super-hiper website
> that'll be maintainable through clickable forms and so o
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0500, Scott O'Nanski wrote:
> The Debian web site stinks.
>
> I want to design a new one. How do I get involved?
Thanks for your interest.
Work is in progress in improving the design (the Kalle's one is the most
advanced and realistic, and the whole site has b
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:01:43PM -0500, Scott O'Nanski wrote:
> The Debian web site stinks.
>
> I want to design a new one. How do I get involved?
Start here http://www.debian.org/devel/website/
And first of all forget about creating flashy-super-hiper website that'll
be maintainable through cl
2010/1/13 Scott O'Nanski :
> Hi.
>
> The Debian web site stinks.
>
> I want to design a new one. How do I get involved?
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
>
>
i m ready!
--
At
Hi.
The Debian web site stinks.
I want to design a new one. How do I get involved?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Nathan!
> I would like to offer a redesign of Debian's website. I will use
> WordPress to power the new site.
Thanks for the offer! I discussed your proposal with some Debian
developers. We came to the conclusion, that Wordpress is not the right
tool for this task. This has many reasons, o
Hello,
My name is Nathan Parikh. I am a freelance web designer/developer. I would
like to offer a redesign of Debian's website.
I appreciate the open source community and I thought that this would be a
good way to give back.
I will use WordPress to power the new site. As for cost, I'll do it for
f
Per Edin:
> To whom it may concern
Debian-www might be a better place for this.
> For the past few weeks we have been missing an official Swedish
> Debian website and we feel that this "hole" needs to be filled.
Well, www.debian.org has had a Swedish translation since 1999
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:50:16AM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Friday 25 February 2005 06:06, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:25:04AM +0100, Per Edin wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your support for Debian. You are aware that the official
> > Debian web site i
On Friday 25 February 2005 06:06, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:25:04AM +0100, Per Edin wrote:
> Thank you for your support for Debian. You are aware that the official
> Debian web site is available in Swedish, right? See:
> http://www.nl.debian.org/index.sv.html
inciden
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 03:25:04AM +0100, Per Edin wrote:
> To whom it may concern
(I'm not more concerned by this than any other Debian Developer, but I
tend to want to meddle in everything :) )
> For the past few weeks we have been missing an official Swedish
> Debian website an
To whom it may concern
We are a group of people who are very interested in the Debian project
and have been using it for quite a long time.
For the past few weeks we have been missing an official Swedish Debian
website and we feel
that this "hole" needs to be filled. We are highly
I am curious as to if you and the debian.org would be interested in a web
development company helping brand and design a new web site for debian.org -
I can see you already have someone working on the site, but if you need more
assistance or are interested in even getting a new overall redesign fo
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> * Richard Stallman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030927 17:16]:
> > This policy has existed as long as our web site. The links to such
> > sites were mistakes; I found out about them as a result of the recent
> > discussion, but the removal of these links has
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 08:26:29AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > Hi, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > And in other news, nobody cares.
> >
> > Well, I do care when somebody who's quite visible in the Free Software
> > scene is (seen as) a hypocrite.
>
> I thin
* Richard Stallman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030927 17:16]:
> This policy has existed as long as our web site. The links to such
> sites were mistakes; I found out about them as a result of the recent
> discussion, but the removal of these links has nothing to do with
> that; we are just following our
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 08:26:29AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > [Subject: FSF has stopped linking to Debian website]
> >
> > And in other news, nobody cares.
>
> Well, I do care when somebody who's quite visible in the Free Software
> scene [...]
&
On 2003-09-27, Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Josip Rodin wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 02:23:37PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> [Subject: FSF has stopped linking to Debian website]
>>
>> And in other news, nobody cares.
>
>
There wasn't supposed to be a link to the Debian web site on
www.gnu.org, because it lists non-free software packages. Except in
the Free Software Directory, we do not link to sites that specifically
suggest the use of any non-free program, or that say how to get a copy
of one.
This policy has ex
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
> On Friday 26 September 2003, at 14 h 23,
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Compare:
> >
> > http://web.archive.org/web/20021128102620/http://www.gnu.org/links/links.ht=
> > ml
> >
> > with:
>
> [ http://www.gnu.org/links/l
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis écrivait :
> How would you deal with such a person? IMHO, The best way is to ignore this
> acts and behave like better people.
Or... May be try to convice him that to be free is to *realy* have the
choice for including or not non-free software, what Debian provides,
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 08:26:29AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > And in other news, nobody cares.
>
> Well, I do care when somebody who's quite visible in the Free Software
> scene is (seen as) a hypocrite.
I think the question is: should we care?
I didn't follow the
Hi, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 02:23:37PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [Subject: FSF has stopped linking to Debian website]
>
> And in other news, nobody cares.
Well, I do care when somebody who's quite visible in the Free Software
scene is (seen as) a hy
On Friday 26 September 2003, at 14 h 23,
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Compare:
>
> http://web.archive.org/web/20021128102620/http://www.gnu.org/links/links.ht=
> ml
>
> with:
[ http://www.gnu.org/links/links.html ]
Funny, FSF does not mention Debian or FreeBSD anymore, but it
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 02:23:37PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
[Subject: FSF has stopped linking to Debian website]
And in other news, nobody cares.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 03:32:16PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 02:23:37PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > This change was quite recent (since 14 August 2003), if we are to accept
> > as true the assertion in the first comment on the article at:
>
> I find myself wonder
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 02:23:37PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> This change was quite recent (since 14 August 2003), if we are to accept
> as true the assertion in the first comment on the article at:
I find myself wondering what relevance this has to any discussion on any
list it was posted o
Quoting Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [Followups set.]
>
> Compare:
>
> http://web.archive.org/web/20021128102620/http://www.gnu.org/links/links.html
>
> with:
>
> http://www.ofb.biz/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=260
>
> This change was quite recent (since 14 August 2003),
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 02:23:37PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Compare:
>
> http://web.archive.org/web/20021128102620/http://www.gnu.org/links/links.html
>
> with:
>
> http://www.ofb.biz/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=260
You know, I just love how screen is always "forgetting" what
[Followups set.]
Compare:
http://web.archive.org/web/20021128102620/http://www.gnu.org/links/links.html
with:
http://www.ofb.biz/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=260
This change was quite recent (since 14 August 2003), if we are to accept
as true the assertion in the first comment on the
47 matches
Mail list logo
