Pierre-Elliott Bécue <p...@debian.org> wrote on 04/04/2023 at 11:13:46+0200:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Good signature from EE215B9FB8C45B0B Pierre-Elliott Bécue > <be...@crans.org> (trust ultimate) created at 2023-04-04T11:22:55+0200 using > RSA]] > Adding DSA as this is a DNS matter which falls under our scope. > > "marito...@yahoo.com" <marito...@yahoo.com> wrote on 04/04/2023 at > 05:36:35+0200: > >> I will start comparing some domains: >> >> root@LEDE:~# nslookup debian.org 1.1.1.1 >> Server: 1.1.1.1 >> Address: 1.1.1.1#53 >> >> Name: debian.org >> Address 1: 130.89.148.77 >> Address 2: 128.31.0.62 >> Address 3: 149.20.4.15 >> Address 4: 2603:400a:ffff:bb8::801f:3e >> Address 5: 2001:67c:2564:a119::77 >> Address 6: 2001:4f8:1:c::15 >> >> root@LEDE:~# nslookup www.debian.org 1.1.1.1 >> Server: 1.1.1.1 >> Address: 1.1.1.1#53 >> >> Name: www.debian.org >> Address 1: 200.17.202.197 >> Address 2: 2801:82:80ff:8009:e61f:13ff:fe63:8e88 >> >> >> The second one only gives Brazilian IP. Why?. Cannot be viewed here. >> Manually editing hosts can "fix" this problem. >> >> 200.17.202.197 is from UFPR, a blocked network by Telecom Argentina and >> Internexa. Well, the entire AS1916 (including ftp.br.debian.org, uepg, >> c3sl...). >> >> Further explanations here: (spanish) >> https://foros.3dgames.com.ar/threads/315307?p=24601216&viewfull=1#post24601216 >> https://foros.3dgames.com.ar/threads/315307?p=24602387&viewfull=1#post24602387 > > www.debian.org name resolution is done through GeoIP DNS (multiple > mirrors over multiple continents). For South America in general, the > only record we put for www.debian.org is santoro.debian.org which is > hosted in brazil. > > The solution here would probably to put an exception on Argentina and > put the IP of a US server for GeoIP DNS. > > I'll see with my DSA Teammates if that's fine with them and consider > this option. After discussing with them internally, it is our opinion that you should probably bring this matter with your ISP as it's not really normal that they block a whole network on web ports. On our side, we do not want to do specific work for specific ISPs having what looks like a bad policy. Regards, -- PEB
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature