I would like to install Debian 4.0 which is included on the linux-magazin
> dvd. I'm not very familiar with linux. my question is: is it possible to
> install this on a pentium I with 166MHz cpu? If not. which linux system
> could be used for this computer?
>
> Nice greets
Hello,
thx for the translated message. Can you answer to my questions, please?
I would like to install Debian 4.0 which is included on the linux-magazin
dvd. I'm not very familiar with linux. my question is: is it possible to
install this on a pentium I with 166MHz cpu? If not. which
Am Montag, 3. September 2007 15:46:40 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Guten Tag,
> das Betreibssystem Debian 4.0, welches auf der Heft-CD vom
> "LINUX-Magazin" 07/07 ist, würde ich gerne installieren. Ich kenne mich
> nicht besonders aus mit LINUX. Meine Frage ist, kann ich
This german User asks for installation help. I'm redirecting to
debian-user-german.
Hauke
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 03:46:40PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Guten Tag,
> das Betreibssystem Debian 4.0, welches auf der Heft-CD vom
> "LINUX-Magazin" 07/07 ist, würde ich
Guten Tag,
das Betreibssystem Debian 4.0, welches auf der Heft-CD vom "LINUX-Magazin"
07/07 ist, würde ich gerne installieren. Ich kenne mich nicht besonders aus mit
LINUX. Meine Frage ist, kann ich Debian 4.0 auf einem Pentium I mit 166 Mhz?
Wenn nein, welche der LINUX Systeme
>http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5673962628.html
>
>Merely somebody who likes Fedora and (Open)SuSE better than Debian, or
>somebody who has a realistic view of the world? While I'm personally happy
>to use etch, I might be a bit biased...
Well, he doesn't seem to have much of a clue about the
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> The only thing I wanted to say is: We should not ignore a text for
> the only reason that the author is a troll. It might happen that
> even trolls find something we can enhance. [...]
That was first posted in reply to me, yet I never suggested th
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 09:30:13PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, David Nusinow wrote:
>
> >Vaughan-Nichols is a troll, pure and simple, and we have vastly more
> >positive things to do for ourselves, for our users, and for the community
> >at large than listen to his puffed up
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, David Nusinow wrote:
Vaughan-Nichols is a troll, pure and simple, and we have vastly more
positive things to do for ourselves, for our users, and for the community
at large than listen to his puffed up sense of entitlement.
OK, I try it once more: There was a valid point i
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 09:13:39PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> >If you find some facts in there,
>
> Well, it was just mentioned that others turned the facts into
> bug reports and I do not really want to reply to double rhetorics.
>
> >feel free
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 09:56:52AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 08:19:03AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > Yo!
> >
> > http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5673962628.html
> >
> > Merely somebody who likes Fedora and (Open)SuSE better than Debian, or
> > somebody who ha
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 08:19:03AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Yo!
>
> http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5673962628.html
>
> Merely somebody who likes Fedora and (Open)SuSE better than Debian, or
> somebody who has a realistic view of the world? While I'm personally happy
> to use etch,
I agree with joy's reply. Additionally...
I understand the reason why it was done, and it would certainly be great if
the Mozilla foundation had a sane Trademark license, but in the mean time I
would very much like if people remembered the G in DFSG a bit more often.
AFAIK the first proble
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:08:44AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> We're telling people that they can/should use Debian, and 5 minutes later
> I have to explain [...]
I sense a bit of frustration in here :) but it's not really necessary.
I mean, you also have to explain people why we e.g. don't
On Friday 13 April 2007 09:54, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
[paraphrasing the article I linked to]
> It's stupid that Debian renames Mozilla applications.
Yes, it is.
> Sure, let's drop the DFSG for lenny.
Seriously: it is very stupid that the licensing/trademark situation lead
Debian to rebra
nical employees. Bad boys.
"openSUSE and Fedora are the community Linuxes of the future."
Nobody could have smelled that coming.
It's not realistic to use 3 applications rebrandings and a new important
bug to try dismissing Debian's fastest release since 2000.
There are many people
Plenty of people complain that our Etch kernel is outdated,
It's not, and I see nobody complaining it is. I've seen 1 Gentoo guy
tell me that we were late (before he checked and realized he had nothing
better than 2.6.19) and don't remember other complaints.
but we don't tell them that a
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> * Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070410 08:19]:
>
>> (There are many news items more or less just quoting the release=20
>> announcement,
>
> But also note, that lazy journalists might falsify your positive
> statistics ;)
(Please take this as enhancement bug, no
Hi!
* Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070410 08:19]:
> (There are many news items more or less just quoting the release
> announcement,
Actually it's often considered to be a good sign if your announcement is
quoted in a news item (not extensive reviews), because that means that
a) your
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
If you find some facts in there,
Well, it was just mentioned that others turned the facts into
bug reports and I do not really want to reply to double rhetorics.
feel free to summarize them for the benefit
of the list so that we don't have to wade t
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 10:39:22AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> 1) there is a bug in etch kernel. (#418344 seems)
>
> While the bug was mentioned in some forums, it was not reported in
> time to BTS. Clearly there are users who find using BTS daunting, and
> thus we don't get bugreports in timely f
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 01:23:11PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
> >The subject should be: SJVN flames debian again... does anyone care?
> Yes - as long there are some pure facts we should care.
If you find some facts in there, feel free to summarize them for t
Hello Nico and *,
Am 2007-04-10 14:41:03, schrieb Nico Golde:
> No especially not if I get:
> Configuration file `/etc/subversion/config'
> ==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation.
> ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version.
>What would you like to do about it ?
Hi,
* Philippe Cloutier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-10 16:27]:
> If someone is not satisfied with a problem in Etch, I strongly
> suggest to report the problem and get it listed in errata if
> appropriate.
Sure if it would be reproducable and I could get a bit more
useful information I would d
If someone is not satisfied with a problem in Etch, I strongly suggest
to report the problem and get it listed in errata if appropriate.
Mailing lists are for discussion, not to be a release.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi,
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-10 13:22]:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
>
> >The subject should be: SJVN flames debian again... does anyone
> >care?
>
> Yes - as long there are some pure facts we should care.
> I don't come to the same conclusion of the article author bu
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
The subject should be: SJVN flames debian again... does anyone care?
Yes - as long there are some pure facts we should care.
I don't come to the same conclusion of the article author but not to
care is the wrong reaction only because the author is known to fl
Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5673962628.html
> Merely somebody who likes Fedora and (Open)SuSE better than Debian, or
> somebody who has a realistic view of the world? [...]
No, somebody who likes to troll debian almost every chance they get.
I
Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5673962628.html
http://www.acc.umu.se/technical/statistics/ftp/monitordata/index.html
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 08:19:03AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5673962628.html
> Merely somebody who likes Fedora and (Open)SuSE better than Debian, or
> somebody who has a realistic view of the world? While I'm personally happy
> to use etch, I might be
Many congratulations to the Debian Project Team members. It is a great
effort. I am continuously watching this release since six month back.
I daily see the page http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ in hope
that number of release critical bugs will ultimately be zero.
It has almost reached th
Yo!
http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5673962628.html
Merely somebody who likes Fedora and (Open)SuSE better than Debian, or
somebody who has a realistic view of the world? While I'm personally happy
to use etch, I might be a bit biased...
(There are many news items more or less just quoting
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 04:54:34PM -0400, Felipe Mu~oz Ca~as wrote:
>
> Hi there! I'm writing to know when will "appear" Debian 4.0?
Somewhen in the next decade. If we're lucky ;-)
(Debian 3.1 will appear a lot sooner, and perhaps 3.2 will, too)
--
EARTH
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 22.38, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach JesÃs Roncero Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.22.2235
+0100]:
> > When it's ready!
>
> While it's true, I don't think it's the best conduct to throw this
> somewhat arrogant sentence at our users in the way you did. Maybe we
Felipe Mu~oz Ca~as wrote:
>
> Hi there! I'm writing to know when will "appear" Debian 4.0?
Uh... What about we release 3.1 first?
Regards,
Joey
--
Let's call it an accidental feature. -- Larry Wall
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
also sprach Jesus Roncero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.23.0031 +0100]:
> It wasn't intended to be arrogant. I'm only repeating what I've
> read many times, or somehow how things work in debian.
... yeah, which is one of the reasons why Debian folks are commonly
considered arrogant. Anyway, this i
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 22:38, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Jesús Roncero Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.22.2235
+0100]:
> > When it's ready!
>
> While it's true, I don't think it's the best conduct to throw this
> somewhat arrogant sentence at our users in the way you did. Maybe we
also sprach Jesús Roncero Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.22.2235 +0100]:
> When it's ready!
While it's true, I don't think it's the best conduct to throw this
somewhat arrogant sentence at our users in the way you did. Maybe we
could resort to euphemisms?
--
Please do not send copies of lis
El 22/Mar/2005 a las 16:54:34, Felipe Mu~oz Ca~as escribió:
>
> Hi there! I'm writing to know when will "appear" Debian 4.0?
When it's ready!
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also sprach Felipe Mu~oz Ca~as <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.22.2154 +0100]:
> Hi there! I'm writing to know when will "appear" Debian 4.0?
We are currently preparing 3.1. Afterwards it may be 3.2 or 4.0 --
nobody knows. It is not possible to give you an estimate.
Howeve
Hi there! I'm writing to know when will "appear" Debian 4.0?
Thanks, bye,
Felipe.
Felipe Muñoz Cañas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
41 matches
Mail list logo
