Hi, * Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-10 13:22]: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, MJ Ray wrote: > > >The subject should be: SJVN flames debian again... does anyone > >care? > > Yes - as long there are some pure facts we should care. > I don't come to the same conclusion of the article author but > not to > care is the wrong reaction only because the author is known to > flame > Debian. We had lots of "thanks for the great release" which has > definitely reasons but we should not simply ignore critics.
No especially not if I get:
Configuration file `/etc/subversion/config'
==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation.
==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version.
What would you like to do about it ? Your options are:
Y or I : install the package maintainer's version
N or O : keep your currently-installed version
D : show the differences between the versions
Z : background this process to examine the situation
The default action is to keep your current version.
*** config (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? Y
Installing new version of config file /etc/subversion/config ...
dpkg: error processing subversion (--configure):
unable to install updated status of `subversion': No such file or directory
*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08135de8 ***
Aborted
When updating to etch ;)
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgpgdzA7qQDPh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
