Re: DEP-5: prior art for license short names

2010-02-03 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:18:25AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > Le Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:30:07PM -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Software_License_List > > > > I think we should consider adopting this existing set of license keywords as

Re: DEP-5: prior art for license short names

2010-01-17 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:30:07PM -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Software_License_List > > I think we should consider adopting this existing set of license keywords as > part of the DEP, and diverging from it only when necessary in order to > res

Re: DEP-5: prior art for license short names

2009-12-30 Thread MJ Ray
Ben Finney wrote: > Steve Langasek writes: > > One concern I have with the current DEP5 draft is that the set of > > keywords for common licenses is very NIH. > > Well, that speaks to motives (NIH) that I don't think were present. I > think it's just that the obvious clearing houses for license i

Re: DEP-5: prior art for license short names

2009-12-23 Thread Ben Finney
Steve Langasek writes: > One concern I have with the current DEP5 draft is that the set of > keywords for common licenses is very NIH. Well, that speaks to motives (NIH) that I don't think were present. I think it's just that the obvious clearing houses for license information (OSI, FSF) didn't

Re: DEP-5: prior art for license short names

2009-12-23 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:30:07PM -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > One concern I have with the current DEP5 draft is that the set of keywords > for common licenses is very NIH. Fedora, for example, has an existing list > of license keywords that are widely deployed, as can be found here: > >

Re: DEP-5: prior art for license short names

2009-12-23 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:30:07PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > One concern I have with the current DEP5 draft is that the set of keywords > for common licenses is very NIH. Fedora, for example, has an existing list > of license keywords that are widely deployed, as can be found here: > > htt

Re: DEP-5: prior art for license short names

2009-12-22 Thread Russ Allbery
Steve Langasek writes: > One concern I have with the current DEP5 draft is that the set of keywords > for common licenses is very NIH. Fedora, for example, has an existing list > of license keywords that are widely deployed, as can be found here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Soft

DEP-5: prior art for license short names

2009-12-22 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi all, One concern I have with the current DEP5 draft is that the set of keywords for common licenses is very NIH. Fedora, for example, has an existing list of license keywords that are widely deployed, as can be found here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Software_License_List I thi