Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes: > One concern I have with the current DEP5 draft is that the set of keywords > for common licenses is very NIH. Fedora, for example, has an existing list > of license keywords that are widely deployed, as can be found here:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Software_License_List > I think we should consider adopting this existing set of license > keywords as part of the DEP, and diverging from it only when necessary > in order to resolve ambiguities or reduce complexity (e.g., using a > single rule about version numbers instead of spelling these all out). I think this is an excellent idea, particularly if we can find a way to coordinate with Fedora for new licenses and use the same keywords in both distribution. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
