On Wednesday 01 June 2005 22:31, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> > >
> > >
>
> This company does not have a phone number listed in Directory
> Assistance, and the number given is "no longer in service".
>
> > >
> > >
>
> NNL Software does not have a phone number listed in Directory
> Assistance, and
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 19:10 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > # Consultant: US
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
> Suggest someone in the US phones.
This company does not have a phone number listed in Directory
Assistance, and the number given is "no longer in service".
> > # Consultant: US
> >
> >
> >
> >
On Monday May 30 2005 12:38 pm, Michael Kallas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
> > When I had my consultation business, I published the e-mail
> > address only as a PNG image. I got one spam messagen in a years
> > time. My privete e-mail adressess, which are published in web
> > pages get a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
> When I had my consultation business, I published the e-mail address
> only as a PNG image. I got one spam messagen in a years time. My
> privete e-mail adressess, which are published in web pages get about
> 150 spams per d
On 20050529T090242+0300, Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
> If publishing e-mail address on the consultants page is mandatory,
> what about publishing it as an image file? I would not want to have my
> business e-mail in clear text in a web page which is an obvious target
> for spammers collecting addresses.
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 11:47:50AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (va, manoj)> wrote:
> > Err, perhaps apply some common sense? Does anyone really doubt
> Expense. Why can't consultants send in their email addresses?
>
When I had my consultation business, I pub
Manoj again trims mention of the reasons why I support the change and
continues to respond to questions with questions rather than answers.
I conclude that it is impossible to convince him of the benefits of
letting the consultants index maintainers contact people by email
and his rhetoric is infin
On Sat, 28 May 2005 17:05:34 +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (va, manoj)> wrote:
>> >> Why can't interested parties pone the consultant directly?
>> > Expense. Why can't consultants send in their email addresses?
>> Since they choose to only spend the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28-05-2005 15:41, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, 28 May 2005 11:38:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> *Sigh*. Do you generally make a practice of jumping to
> unwarranted conclusions? Who said that DD's are to b
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (va, manoj)> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 May 2005 11:47:50 +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Is the stable release manager still offering debian services and
> > wants listing on w.d.o/c?
> Have you asked?
I've already written as much. You don't know
On Sat, 28 May 2005 11:47:50 +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (va, manoj)> wrote:
>> Err, perhaps apply some common sense? Does anyone really doubt that
>> the stable release manager is missing? Or is no longer involved in
>> Debian?
> Is the stable r
On Sat, 28 May 2005 11:38:14 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
*Sigh*. Do you generally make a practice of jumping to
unwarranted conclusions? Who said that DD's are to be treated
differently? If a non DD consultant was known to be active and
working witrh Debian, we s
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (va, manoj)> wrote:
> Err, perhaps apply some common sense? Does anyone really doubt
> that the stable release manager is missing? Or is no longer involved
> in Debian?
Is the stable release manager still offering debian services
and wants listing on
"Brian M. Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am in the US, and I could phone, but I am not a DD. Is this okay?
> Please let me know soon; this weekend is a national holiday.
I think it's OK. All it needs is to ask them to review their
listing on the web site and send an update in, or report
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28-05-2005 07:04, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2005 20:39:09 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
>
>>Your reaction sounded to me like you want Debian developers (and
>>especially ones with trusted jobs within our or
On Fri, 27 May 2005 19:59:30 +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You could ask him yourself. My concern is whether this is a sane
>> guideline to impose, not to be Joey's keeper.
> I consider the guideline sane and it's been discussed since the
On Fri, 27 May 2005 20:39:09 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Your reaction sounded to me like you want Debian developers (and
> especially ones with trusted jobs within our organisation?) treated
> any different than other consultants. I disagree with that (and hope
> I misund
On Fri, 27 May 2005 21:22:58 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> We *did* have a long thread discussing about this, so I kind of
Prior heated discussions somehow preclude the application of
common sense?
manoj
--
Toddlers are the stormtroopers of the Lord of Ent
Bill Allombert wrote:
Given that MJ Ray has taken the trouble to check the list for sites that
are still active, I think you are hitting the wrong nail[1] with the wrong
hammer[2].
Actually it is hammerhead[1], as suggested by p.d.o's non-exact search.
SCNR.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
[1] h
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 19:10 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > # Consultant: US
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> >
>
> Suggest someone in the US phones.
I am in the US, and I could phone, but I am not a DD. Is this okay?
Please let me know soon; this weekend is a national holiday.
> > # Consultant: US
> >
> >
>
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:26:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 07:15:14PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > So, uh, our stable release manager and security team lead is being
> > > de-listed
> > > as a Debian consultant because he h
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.27.2012 +0200]:
> No, it's not. The web and the real world aren't disjoint sets, and I don't
> see how it's of any benefit to people who are looking for Debian services to
> exclude self-evidently qualified consultants from the list just beca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27-05-2005 20:12, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 07:22:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
>>>So, uh, our stable release manager and security team lead is being de-listed
>>>as a Debian consultant because he hasn't provided an em
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could ask him yourself. My concern is whether this is a sane guideline
> to impose, not to be Joey's keeper.
I consider the guideline sane and it's been discussed since the
start of last November at least on -project and -www. The reason
is primari
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 07:15:14PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, uh, our stable release manager and security team lead is being de-listed
> > as a Debian consultant because he hasn't provided an email address to list
> > on this page? This suggests to me
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, uh, our stable release manager and security team lead is being de-listed
> as a Debian consultant because he hasn't provided an email address to list
> on this page? This suggests to me that the listing criteria are rather
> suboptimal.
Maybe Martin
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 07:22:22PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > So, uh, our stable release manager and security team lead is being de-listed
> > as a Debian consultant because he hasn't provided an email address to list
> > on this page? This suggests to me that the listing criteria are rath
Why wasn't this posted to the consultants list?
Here are the details I can find:
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # Consultant: Brazil
>
>
> http://www.teknologico.com/";>
Domain is now squatted. Not listed on db.debian.org
> # Consultant: France
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.kanis.cc/";>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27-05-2005 19:07, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 06:20:10PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>>According to the new policy for the consultants page which you can find
>>at the bottom of the consultants page [1] an email address is require
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 06:20:10PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> According to the new policy for the consultants page which you can find
> at the bottom of the consultants page [1] an email address is required
> to be listed.
> So, attached is the list of the entries that have no email address
> inclu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
According to the new policy for the consultants page which you can find
at the bottom of the consultants page [1] an email address is required
to be listed.
So, attached is the list of the entries that have no email address
included. These entries
31 matches
Mail list logo
