On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:26:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 07:15:14PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, uh, our stable release manager and security team lead is being > > > de-listed > > > as a Debian consultant because he hasn't provided an email address to list > > > on this page? This suggests to me that the listing criteria are rather > > > suboptimal. > > > Maybe Martin Schulze is just a little busy and hasn't checked > > his listing yet? I think even DWN has reported that it needs > > doing, so I'm sure he would have read it. You could ask him to > > email an update to luk, instead of just sniping. > > You could ask him yourself. My concern is whether this is a sane guideline > to impose, not to be Joey's keeper.
Given that MJ Ray has taken the trouble to check the list for sites that are still active, I think you are hitting the wrong nail[1] with the wrong hammer[2]. I think it is a good guideline, but a guideline is not to be interpreted too strictly. The fact that several sites do not exist anymore show it was not useless. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. [1] http://packages.debian.org/nail [2] http://packages.debian.org/hammer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
