Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality

2022-04-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 11:38:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 20:35 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > > Budget: We need to determine our current CO2 emissions as a project, > > and then define a roadmap to carbon neutrality by an acceptable date, >

Re: We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality

2022-04-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 02:52:18PM -0400, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > On 2022-04-08 14 h 35, Julian Andres Klode wrote:> I think individual > travel to DebConf and similar events is somewhat> out of our control, as > is the personal behavior of individual> submitters. >

We need to define a path for Debian to climate neutrality

2022-04-08 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Hi it just occurred to me that despite the climate crisis about to destroy us all we don't really have anything in place to monitor and reduce our carbon emissions. I believe we need to commit ourselves to reducing this, but I fear the only way this could happen is via a general resolution amendi

Löschung meiner Daten

2009-09-22 Thread Julian Hüper
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, ich bitte darum alle meine Daten in Ihrem Portal zu löschen. Meinen Account sowie alle meine Posts. Ich wäre Ihnen sehr Dankbar über eine Bestätigung. Mit frendlichen Grüssen Julian Hüper -- Powered by Gentoo Foundation, Inc. && www.sn-music.de GR

Re: Who uses @packages.d.o mail?

2009-05-24 Thread Julian Gilbey
ould email the package maintainers directly. Would it be possible to allow mail from arbitrary hosts as long as it has some special header, say "X-Debian-Pkg: foo" where foo matches the package being mailed? However, I wouldn't personally have a problem with it being blocked complet

New Penis Enlargement Patches!

2005-07-15 Thread Julian
Expand your Penis 20% Larger in weeks http://www.xunepa.com/ss/ All pleasures contain an element of sadness. Hypocrisy is the vaseline of political intercourse. The limits of my language mean the limits of my world. Time does not change us. It just unfolds us. Once harm has

Which side of the bed did you get out of this morning, then? :))))

2005-04-19 Thread Julian
Oops... :) Having tried pills and realizing the importance of sustaining regular blood levels of the formula through consistent regular dosing, I realized my life was far too busy to keep track. With this product I simply slap it on and let it do it.s thing, no muss or fuss. This patch truly ro

Re: Help

2002-10-03 Thread Julian Gilbey
not sell anything: we make it available to everyone over the internet for free. Vendors are able to produce CDs and to sell them if they wish at whatever price they wish. Installation guides are available from the Debian website. Please visit http://www.debian.org/ and go f

Re: admins: please clarify /etc/motd on auric

2002-08-31 Thread Julian Gilbey
between 14:30 and 17:30 UTC-0400" or whatever. All it needs to say is "local time", and we need know no more, for the crontabs are understood as being in local time, right? ;-) And for anyone who's interested, running "date" will give us the timezone information.

Bug#157123: project: modify emacs policy

2002-08-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 08:54:12AM -0400, D. Goel wrote: > Julian > > > > > [1] It seems that, by default, /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/foo/ don't > > > No, this package *does* have a /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/erc/ > > directory in it. > > > We

Bug#157123: project: modify emacs policy

2002-08-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 07:31:21PM -0400, D. Goel wrote: > > > You wouldn't be confusing the directories > > /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/*, which contain the .elc files, > > and the directories /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/*, which contain the > > .el files, would yo

Bug#157123: project: modify emacs policy

2002-08-18 Thread Julian Gilbey
ldn't be confusing the directories /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/*, which contain the .elc files, and the directories /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/*, which contain the .el files, would you? I think we can close this report. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-10 Thread Julian Gilbey
s are considered build-essential, even though the official definition is that given by policy. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London website: http://www.maths

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-09 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 03:48:28AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 06:11:46PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:02:50PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > I'm concerned about this because when I tried passing over > > >

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-09 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 04:02:47AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 06:19:54PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > > Then each section could either have the structure: > > > > Policy dictate s > > > > Discussion, useful information, g

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-06 Thread Julian Gilbey
old packaging manual, it introduced the contradictions (oops). I vaguely recall that at that time, a freeze was effectively placed on substantially rewriting policy because of the upcoming freeze of woody. We are still in this freeze period, and both Manoj and I are itching to rewrite the current spaghe

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-06 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:34:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 10:09:11AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Part I: The Debian Archive > > 1: DFSG and the sections of the archive (free, non-free, contrib, non-us) > > >

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-03 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 03:20:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >>"Julian" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Julian> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 02:30:34PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > >> > >> Refer to a dpkg reference

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 02:30:34PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Part I: The Debian Archive > > 1: DFSG and the sections of the archive (free, non-free, contrib, non-us) > > non-us is a different archive. I understand; this

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
he final decision on what is RC rests with the release manager.) Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London website: http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~jdg/ Debian GNU/Linux

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
don't see how > anyone could make that complaint. People *used* to make that complaint. And if we now move to having a lean policy standards document and a developers reference and a best programming advice document and a dpkg documentation document, we'll have even mor

Re: Working on debian developer's reference and "best packaging practices"

2002-05-01 Thread Julian Gilbey
e most frequent complaint about the old policy + packaging manual: they contradict, and I have to look in two documents. I've been thinking of having a merged policy/packaging manual for a while, but suddenly realised when I read your mail above that this might be the ideal way t

Re: MIA Maintainer Process Proposal

2001-03-01 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 04:08:06PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Julian Gilbey wrote: > > Good guidelines. One point: we must always remember to check whether > > a maintainer has filled in the "On vacation" field in the DB. > > Occasionally, develope

Re: MIA Maintainer Process Proposal

2001-02-28 Thread Julian Gilbey
opers are forced to go on extended leave (army callups or similar). Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~j

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive

2001-02-20 Thread Julian Gilbey
without expert guidance. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg Donate free food to the w

Re: CLarksville Linux Users Group

2001-02-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
eer organisation, not a large vendor. We produce CD images (http://cdrom.debian.org/) but do not actually produce or sell CDs ourselves. If you are looking for Debian CDs, please ask a CD-ROM distributor. Or maybe there is some nice person out there will

Re: Retiring

2001-01-31 Thread Julian Gilbey
Thank you for the work you have done! Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg Donate free food to the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive

2001-01-12 Thread Julian Gilbey
tricted license" mean in this context? > > Surely even if the license is DFSG-free, the software would have to > > live on non-us if the algorithm is patented? > > the "restricted license" refers to the license on the patent, i believe. Say > you go out and

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive

2001-01-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
ext? Surely even if the license is DFSG-free, the software would have to live on non-us if the algorithm is patented? Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London Debian G

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive

2001-01-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
exporting crypto to the 7 blacklisted > countries Assuming that the legalities are OK (IANAL), I second this proposal. It will certainly clean up some messy stuff (eg enabling fetchmail ssl mode). Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

NM process reasons

2000-09-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
than in a "single piece of software" project - so big mistakes or malice are in general much more serious than in a small OSS project - so Debian needs to attempt to ensure that potential developers are competent and identifiable ->

Re: Final report for Andreas Mueller

2000-09-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
es it work, then he'll need to upgrade to gnupg-1.0.2 or later and generate a new key. That's what James posted recently. Sorry for the hassle. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of Lond

DMUP

2000-09-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
Should we mention the Debian Machine Usage Policy to our applicants? I think it might be a wise thing to do, at least in passing Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL

AM report for Martin Michlmayr

2000-09-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
is in working on the MIPS port, provided he can get access to a MIPS machine. He has shown that he is competent by correctly packaging cplay. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROT

Re: AM Mini-HOWTO

2000-09-23 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 12:51:10AM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote: > I think Debian uses several format. DDP usually uses debiandoc-sgml, > but www team uses wml. > > And in this case of New Maint AM HOWTO, the author, Julian Gilbey, > wrote that he uses plain text to make it easily

AM report: Yves Arrouye

2000-09-22 Thread Julian Gilbey
for adoption/orphaned. Welcome back, Yves! Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg Donate free food

Re: AM report for Marek Habersack

2000-09-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
list; the full detailed report is ONLY sent to the Front Desk and DAMs. Dale: maybe the -admin -> -discuss gateway does need moderating after all, unfortunately. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Uni

New version of AM-HOWTO

2000-09-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
[This version takes account of various people's comments -- jdg] Mini-HOWTO for Debian New Maintainer Application Managers Copyright Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, September 2000 This is in the public domain. The fount of all knowledge is the New Maintainer pages. St

Re: Where to send NM reports?

2000-09-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 07:41:50PM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 11:26:14PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > The basic report (just name, did they pass steps 2, 3 and 4, do you > > approve them) goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > The full report (wh

Re: AM Mini-HOWTO

2000-09-17 Thread Julian Gilbey
gt; Is this OK ? Of course! I may also submit patches from time to time, based on people's comments Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Li

Re: Where to send NM reports?

2000-09-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
o the Front Desk, and another one. Erm, did I say this? If it isn't clear, I'd like to clarify it. Thanks for doing this! Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROT

[e9625136@student.tuwien.ac.at: Re: becomming a debian developer (fwd)]

2000-09-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
Please could we do something about this? Thanks, Julian - Forwarded message from Michael Moerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 16:21:08 +0200 (METDST) From: Michael Moerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian devel Subject: Re: becomming a debian developer (fwd)

Re: Query on requirements for identification

2000-09-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:11:17PM -0700, Jim Westveer wrote: > John, > > Actually the two references you mention say the same thing. Ah, you have a new email address ;-) nm-step2 needs updating to reflect the new procedures.

Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter

2000-09-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 04:45:25AM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote: Your PGP signature was bad. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Linux Developer

New developers -> new AMs

2000-09-14 Thread Julian Gilbey
through the NM process[1] is to act as AM for two or three applicants. In that way, the queue will be cleared much more quickly than it would do otherwise, freeing most of us to do "more useful" things for Debian (like getting back to my coding ;-) Thanks for the help! Julian [1]

Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchive removal)

2000-07-09 Thread Julian Gilbey
uments for the project). I support this idea. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg Donate free food

Re: The proposed GR: catch-22

2000-06-08 Thread Julian Gilbey
Debian was > founded. we should do it. And how, exactly, would that work? Do you have any idea how many complaints I heard when Debian only changed its internal archive structure a couple of releases ago? How many lusers couldn't figure it out? Get real! Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: Incoming

2000-04-03 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 03:48:00AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > Like during the Perl transition period, or when a recent libstdc++ > > broke apt, or when su stopped being able to su, or when > > What you are d

Re: Incoming

2000-04-03 Thread Julian Gilbey
g the Perl transition period, or when a recent libstdc++ broke apt, or when su stopped being able to su, or when Need I continue? Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTEC

When NM reopens

2000-01-13 Thread Julian Gilbey
he packaging tools and the intricacies of policy requirements without having to cope initially with a large number of bug reports. I would be happy to hand on some of my simple packages to the new developers and even do some handholding. Anyone else think sim

Re: Getting rid of section "base" ?

1999-11-29 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 01:45:17AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > Just some examples: Why are devscripts in util and not in devel? Aren´t > they for developement? devscripts (2.1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Moved package from utils to devel (closes: #33410) -- Julian Gilbey &

New maintainer?

1999-11-16 Thread Julian Gilbey
It seems that, despite Wichert's proposal, new maintainer is still in limbo. Seeing as the freeze has been delayed by a few months, there is no excuse not to reopen NM. What can we do about this? I am willing to help. J

Re: Debian Law... come to Debian country!

1999-11-11 Thread Julian Gilbey
that someone does step significantly out of line and claim that they did not realise that what they were doing was unacceptable, the DPL can point them to the relevant document. About the other documents: Pretty much the same seems to apply: they are created in

Re: Proposed change to Debian constitution

1999-11-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
vote than by > > waiting for the NM system to collapse, as we ended up doing. > > Well, maybe because all but 1 people tried to help technically > instead of working on the issue on the proper stage. (sorry, can't > express it like I want). Fair enough. But now: wh

Re: Proposed change to Debian constitution

1999-11-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
bstantial, and yet all were turned down by the then team. However, I think feelings within the project and probably the project itself would have been far more badly hurt by resorting to a vote than by waiting for the NM system to collapse, as we ended up doi

Re: Data does NOT belong in Debian (was: Stop Archive bloat)

1999-10-20 Thread Julian Gilbey
ut Debian is that important things are available as standard on the CDs of the distribution. I personally regard RFCs as generally important to anyone programming any net-aware or net-related software. Julian =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gil

Re: Data does NOT belong in Debian (was: Stop Archive bloat)

1999-10-20 Thread Julian Gilbey
a tar.gz/tar.bz2 file which is symlinked from source or something like that? Julian =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg

Re: Data does NOT belong in Debian (was: Stop Archive bloat)

1999-10-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
n which a large amount of free software is based and are absolutely crucial to developers. Why should they have to hunt the web for such stuff? Julian =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL