On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 19:12 +0100, Christian Kastner wrote:
> > Preferred Form of Modification
> > ==
> > [...]
> > As a practical matter, for the non-monopolies in the free software
> > ecosystem, the preferred form of modification for base models is the
> > model thems
Hi all,
On 2025-02-05 15:45, Sam Hartman wrote:
> First, thanks for all your work on AI and free software.
> When I started my own AI explorations, I found your ML policy
> inspirational in how I thought about AI and free software.
Same here -- thanks, Mo!
> I have come to believe that:
>
> 1)
Hola de nuevo :) , acabo de ver la información que se encuentra en la URL
ascendente del proyecto y creo que me arreglaré con eso, probaré cuando llegue
a casa, muchas gracias de cualquier forma.
Disculpen las molestias, soy relativamente nuevo en Linux, he sufrido problemas
graves de seguridad
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025, Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Regarding source packages, I suspect that most or our upstream authors
> that will end up using free AI will *not* include training datasets in
> distribution tarballs or Git repositories of the main software. So what
> w
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Regarding source packages, I suspect that most or our upstream authors
that will end up using free AI will *not* include training datasets in
distribution tarballs or Git repositories of the main software. So what
will we do downstream? Do we repack source packages to in
Hi Mo,
your effort in driving this is much appreciated.
There's a second thread going on ("A different Take on AI") where many
have chimed into the deeper specific issues, so I'll include my specific
replies there, and here will only reply to formalities:
On 2025-02-02 06:56, M. Zhou wrote:
> (2
6 matches
Mail list logo
