Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2

2024-10-27 Thread David Bremner
Stefano Zacchiroli writes: > > I don't understand your argument that this decision is not in the realm > of the ftpmaster activities. How could it *not* be, given they are the > team deciding NEW queue acceptance, and that most notably they do so > based on licensing aspects? > I didn't really m

Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2

2024-10-27 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Oct 27, 2024 at 09:00:07AM -0300, David Bremner wrote: > While I agree with Stefano's later followup that GR's are not good tools > for building concensus, I'm not sure such policy decision is really in > the spirit of the FTP master delegation. I recognize that my skepticism > is influence

Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2

2024-10-27 Thread David Bremner
Mo Zhou writes: > My mind remains mostly the same from 6 years ago. And after 5~6 years, > the most important concept in ML-Policy remains to be ToxicCandy, > which is exactly AI released under open source license with their > training data hidden. Although I'm not involved with machine learning