Mo Zhou <lu...@debian.org> writes: > My mind remains mostly the same from 6 years ago. And after 5~6 years, > the most important concept in ML-Policy remains to be ToxicCandy, > which is exactly AI released under open source license with their > training data hidden.
Although I'm not involved with machine learning (aka "AI") in Debian, I do feel pretty strongly that secret training data is wrong for software in Debian main. So consider this a note of support. While I agree with Stefano's later followup that GR's are not good tools for building concensus, I'm not sure such policy decision is really in the spirit of the FTP master delegation. I recognize that my skepticism is influenced by the fact that I would consider following the proposed "OSAID" model to be a substantial weakening of the DFSG.
